Talk:The Translator's Invisibility

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Translator's Invisibility article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Translation studies

	This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.Translation studiesWikipedia:WikiProject Translation studiesTemplate:WikiProject Translation studiesTranslation studies articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Page Creation[edit]

This is just a first draft of the page. It lacks secondary sources for now, but there are plenty to find as it's a well-known book in the field. Jstor or Ebsco should have plenty of people citing/discussing it and it's been subject to reviews in newspapers. This will be to do later but for now at least the page exists. It would also be nice to have a section for reception and a breakdown of the chapter content. pomegranatehouse (talk) 11:55, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article Issues[edit]

I'm deleting the following tag:

The topic of this article may not meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for books. (February 2013)

I think the notability standard is easily met here, since it's a major work from a well-known scholar and a big academic publishing house.

However, I'd like an admin point of view on whether this article is now sufficiently sourced to remove this tag:

This article relies on references to primary sources. (February 2013)

Thoughts? pomegranatehouse (talk) 22:17, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]