This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Warisill did the La joven page. The original link on Bunuel's page had a capitalization error, and sooner or later I'll get around to cleaning that up. I'm still learning Wikipedia's syntax.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Warisill (talk • contribs) 19:52, 12 July 2005 (UTC)
Image:LaJoven.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:13, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
"here is the film's only Bunuelism, the shoe fetish"
That is a bold statement. Even if one doesn't hold the theme of a man forcing himself on a woman as a Bunuelism, at least the unexpected shots of insects (loads of spiders and bees) and animals (fox? and chickens) should be considered as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 12:48, 18 November 2012 (UTC)