Talk:Thom Brooks
This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:06, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:22, 11 July 2019 (UTC)
A number of recent edits and reverts have come from IPs in Durham/from Durham University. While I cannot prove it falls under WP:COI the recent edits make the article read more like a resume. The source for notability of academic works is cited as Google Scholar and the academic's own website, which may be WP:OR. I believe this article should be re-edited to remove unnecessary information indicative of an academic resume than can span over dozens of pages for no good reason other than self-promotion. Nicnotesay hello!contribs 12:36, 6 December 2020 (UTC)
- The issue of self-promotion seems to be still ongoing. There is no evidence of Brooks being an advisor to the Labour Party, and my recent edit clearing this up was removed by an anonymous user. April1Tues (talk) 08:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
- Biography articles of living people
- C-Class biography articles
- C-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Low-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- C-Class Philosophy articles
- Low-importance Philosophy articles
- C-Class philosopher articles
- Low-importance philosopher articles
- Philosophers task force articles
- C-Class social and political philosophy articles
- Low-importance social and political philosophy articles
- Social and political philosophy task force articles
- C-Class Contemporary philosophy articles
- Low-importance Contemporary philosophy articles
- Contemporary philosophy task force articles