Talk:Thomas Erskine (theologian)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

objectivity standards[edit]

While the entry contains good, warm biographical info at present (11/07), it slips in subjective interpretation and appreciation at numerous points. I suggest removing references to being ahead of his time, being sincere, being the greatest, etc., especially for a man who ostensibly dwelt in the midst of considerable constroversy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stormbuffalo (talkcontribs) 08:55, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]