This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
it might be a bit tricky with living persons curriculums, but i still find it that the article misses some obvious hint at the nature of work of this person. while mention of the ignobel prize is somewhat telling, the article still should say something more explicit along the line that he used his work mostly to make a living off the attention directed at him without actually engaging into anything that would have practical implications.
now understanding that WP needs 2-ry sources for saying something it might be the case that the lack of such sources can be taken as a hint at notability (other than a media personage), eg the lack thereof. but then the article should read as a description of an attention-hunter media phenomenon person and not as a person doing design, engineering, or anything of that sort. even if he himself calls what he does designing, or engineering, or building stuff that doesnt mean that what he describes so is appreciated as such by the secondary sources that can be used to descibe his occupation. just having a training in the designing field also no warrant that his occupation should be called design, or something similar. 89.134.199.32 (talk) 21:37, 21 March 2019 (UTC).[reply]
