Talk:Tinkerbells Fairydust

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

First, you only claim the band is important. That may save it from speedy delete, but it can still be deleted via AfD; and without references to establish its notability, it will be deleted that way. It needs some sort of references whatsoever to back up all the claims that are being made, and also references that prove that this band is important in any way whatsoever.

Next, the writing isn't neutral. Don't use phrases like "nice minor-keyed piece". "Nice" is subjective, and therefore automatically NPOV. I know other music articles may use this same wording; too bad, they're all wrong too. — TheBilly^(Talk) 19:30, 15 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am baffled. Wikipedia is a comprehensive encyclopedia. A band which has been publicly recorded and sold is surely not completely insignificant. Furthermore #1 in Japan at one point seems to earn the band some recognition, if only of its existence and characteristics.Tallifer1 (talk) 04:36, 15 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]