Jump to content

Talk:To Be Kind

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Steve Albini

[edit]

I notice that an IP editor keeps adding Steve Albini as a producer for this album. I'm looking at the credits in the booklet of the album as I type and can't see his name anywhere. Good work to those who've removed this and something to keep an eye on incase it gets re-added. Thanks. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 18:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

10 reviews

[edit]

For the reception section. I count 11 in the summary box. Which one should be removed? musicOMH? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 19:56, 16 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Useful source

[edit]

Interview http://pitchfork.com/features/interviews/9400-swans/ I don't have time to add this to the article now but someone should. —Justin (koavf)TCM 17:05, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment for my most recent edit

[edit]

koavf, why didn't you just add the album as a source then? I'm adding it multiple times for every seperate track listing/every seperate track listing template. A reader could assume only the first one was sourced if I didn't. Also, the live tracks are only included in a deluxe version of the album, there's no need for it to be non-collapsed. Littlecarmen (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Littlecarmen: You don't need to cite things like "X book has three chapters" or the track listing of an album: the source is the work itself. By this logic, don't we need to provide a citation that the citation says this? And a citation for that, too? If you want to know the track listing of To Be Kind, just check the album itself. Unless there's some weird controversy about the track listing (e.g. different editions have different songs), then there's nothing to be cited. —Justin (koavf)TCM 04:55, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Cites needed for the tracklisting were added with this edit, which was made one day before the album was released, so I can understand the need to cite that. I guess it's the same situation as casts for film articles - they don't need citing, unless there's a question mark over a cameo or role title. Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 09:14, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see someone keeps adding this review into the reception section. Looking at the article, I'm struggling to see if indeed it's actually notable enough to have its own article on WP. Thoughts? Lugnuts Dick Laurent is dead 07:16, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I also believe that his reviews aren't notable for inclusion in the infobox (there were some discussion related to this somewhere on WP), the blog (or Anthony Fantano) seems fairly notable in my opinion. Nevertheless, I also think that the talk page of To Be Kind is not the most appropriate place to discuss the notability of the article. Myxomatosis57 (talk) 15:41, 26 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

07/26/2014

Apologies for the format, I don't know how to use Wikipedia. I made the edit yesterday to add The Needle Drop's review to the reception section because the reviewer gave the album a 10/10, which is notable because it is the second time in his reviewing history that he gave an album a perfect score. The Needle Drop (https://www.youtube.com/user/theneedledrop/) has 319,497 subscribers and 55,807,407 views on YouTube, making the channel the most popular music critic on the site. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 23.120.120.155 (talk) 04:47, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]