This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rave, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.RaveWikipedia:WikiProject RaveTemplate:WikiProject RaveRave articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
I haven't heard the Cass Fox version of 'Touch Me', so am not in a position to say, but if it is very different from the Rui Da Silva version (ie done in a completely different musical style, ie jazz or blues, rather than dance/house like the RdS version) then it probably shouldn't be merged, as they are 2 different but related songs. I'll try and get a copy of her album and have a listen within the next week or so.Jaganath23:48, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support per WP:SONGS and music guidelines. It does not matter whether it "sounds different" or performed in a different musical style. Articles are about SONGS - i.e., not about SINGLES. An encyclopedia article about a SONG explains the different ways artists interpret it and the evolution of different versions. Covers, remixes, re-issues, etc. do not get their own articles - they are all explained in one encyclopedia entry. - eo13:08, 1 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The part about the Spandau Ballet-inspired riff needs to be reworked...the track DOES have the riff, I remember it clearly when it first hit the radio, also Gary Kemp has a writing credit which indicates the finished track does contain that content. Go listen to the track on YouTube, the riff is clearly there. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A02:C7D:7E60:4800:7C3A:D6C6:3E14:EF3D (talk) 01:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]