Talk:Tower Heist/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 17:08, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I will review the article. -- Matthew RD 17:08, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Criteria

1. Well written: See notes below
2. Sources: General pass, but there is one issue in the comments list below.
3. Broadness in coverage: ✓ Pass
4. Neutral: ✓ Pass
5. Stability: General ✓ Pass, no major edit conflict issues.
6. Images: ✓ Pass

Comments

• The lead section should mention the general view by critics (was it positively received? Mixed? Negative?) and how much the film grossed in the box office.
• "Josh responds by destroying the windows of Shaw's Ferrari 250 getting them fired." I don't understant this sentence. Was it Josh who gets fired? In this case it would be him, not them.
• Link bellhop.
• There is one instance that Slide is referred to as Slides.
• Mazin accepts but Josh, being the primary conspirator, must serve a two-year sentence.
• In the cast section when it is mentioned the actors get paid x amount of money say "million" not "M".

• Same again at the end of the filming section.
• And the are a few more instances in the box office section.

• Unlink Bernard Madoff in writing section, it is already linked in cast section.
• Ref #6 is a PDF file, which is 34 pages long. Elaborate which page the comments are in.

I'll place the review on hold for seven days. I probably might not respond on the 25th, being Christmas Day and all (food and presents!). -- Matthew RD 13:37, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I didn't nominate it for GA but I was the main contributor so I've done some of these, except the plot related ones as I haven't seen it yet and don't want to spoil myself. I think the only thing I've missed and I'm going to do now is read through REf #6 to sort that out.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 14:27, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Dealt with ref 6 which is now ref 1.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

I'll deal with the plot-related issues. RAP (talk) 18:50 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Just wanted to say sorry about the plot stuff, I haven't even seen the film but the plot was around 1200 words and it really needed to get cut down before this review. That sentence about the ferrari was extremely confusing. --Peppage^ಠ_ಠ 01:28, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

That's OK. I see the plot issues, as well as the other issues, have been addressed. I will pass the article. -- Matthew RD 14:32, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to do this Matthew, much appreciated. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 15:52, 26 December 2011 (UTC)