Talk:Trademark erosion

Merge Proposal

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result was Merge.--Ankit Maity ^{Talk | contribs} 16:24, 26 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Merge One other article (the target, Genericized Trademark) links to it, and this article is so brief that it can merged easily. Also, Antonomasia is the only other linking article ("See also"), and is only slightly related. -- David Spalding (☎ ✉ ✍) 15:56, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Yes, the article is so tiny that it could easily be a section in the genericized trademark article. We should merge them. Tegrenath (talk) 00:48, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: This particular article does not seem to cover much that is not already covered in the proposed merge target; I would not be surprised if redirecting this article to the target would be sufficient. Oh, and the correct target article is Genericized trademark, not Genericized Trademark, a redirect. Regards, {|Retro00064|☎talk|✍contribs|} 22:22, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support: It simply makes sense, honestly. They are usually the same thing anyhow. unitas (talk) 10:25, 24 December 2011 (UTC)veritaspaideia[reply]
- Support for all reasons given above.--Dmol (talk) 10:40, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.