Talk:Protobothrops mangshanensis

	Protobothrops mangshanensis is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

China Low‑importance

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zhaoermia mangshanensis?

This species should be classified and listed as Zhaoermia mangshanensis - the validity of the genus Ermia (later substituted by Zhaoermia) has been demonstrated in a number of phylogenetic studies that have shown it to be only distantly related to Trimeresurus, and more closely related to Protobothrops and Triceratolepidophis. The genus Zhaoermia has been widely recognised in the recent literature, and the fact that this species does not belong with Trimeresurus is now entirely uncontentious.

Reference:

Malhotra, A. & R.S. Thorpe (2004) A phylogeny of four mitochondrial gene regions suggests a revised taxonomy for Asian pitvipers (Trimeresurus and Ovophis). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 32: 83–100 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caissaca (talk • contribs) 15:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, but the ITIS taxonomy, which we're currently using for all of these articles, still lists it as Trimeresurus mangshanensis. For a lengthier explanation, see my comments here. --Jwinius (talk) 18:18, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks for the explanation, I can see the rationale for sticking to a single supposedly authoritative source of reference, but it does seem a little unfortunate in cases where ITIS is 4 years behind the times in implementing a perfectly rational, well supported and uncontentious change... one of the perils of tying yourself to one single source of information, I suppose. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Caissaca (talk • contribs) 19:44, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This may not be the only viper species to spit venom either. Campbell & Lamar (2004) cite Mole (1924) who observed Bothrops asper to eject venom over a distance of at least 6 feet (1.8 m) in fine jets from the tips of its fangs. --Jwinius (talk) 15:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trimeresurus-mangshanensis-1.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Trimeresurus-mangshanensis-1.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations

What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Trimeresurus-mangshanensis-1.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]