Talk:Tule River War

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

California C‑class Mid‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestions[edit]

G'day, interesting article. I have assessed it as Start class on the Military History project's rating scale, but with a few changes here or there, I think it could qualify for a higher rating. I have the following suggestions in this regard:

add citations in the places where I have added the "citation needed" tags;
expand the lead to summarise the whole article;
add an image or an infobox (preferably both if possible).

If you would like a second opinion, please feel free to list the article for assessment at WP:MHA. Thanks for your efforts so far and good luck taking the article further. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I've updated the assessment now based on recent work. I believe it meets the B-class criteria now. Well done. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:01, 14 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]