Jump to content

Talk:Tupolev Tu-2000

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Speed?

[edit]

Article says top speed is Mach 24 in space... I think this article should define the speed of sound in a vacuum to ensure no-one misunderstands this information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.6.35.235 (talk) 23:02, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tu-2000.jpg Nominated for Deletion

[edit]
An image used in this article, File:Tu-2000.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests October 2011
What should I do?

Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 12:18, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Powerplant

[edit]

The specifications section states that the powerplant was planned as 6 × liquid hydrogen with liquid oxygen oxidizer turbo jet/scramjet.

But a jet engine - using conventional terminology - uses atmospheric oxygen as oxidiser; if you're carrying your oxidiser, then you're a rocket engine (if you see what I mean).

Something's not right. I don't have the book used as the supposed source of this claim.

Anyone?

Michael F 1967 (talk) 20:28, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]