Talk:Tutorial

Page Ideas

perhaps this can be an index for tutorials under various categories, such as cooking, gardening, programming, etc

Wikipedia is WP:NOT a set of tutorials or a web directory of tutorials. Sorry. --Perfecto 05:39, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like multiple Tutorial topics in one page. I might recommend disabiguating them into multiple articles and turning this into a disambiguation page.

They'd then end up as stubs...None of the sections are long enough for stand alone articles.--Zebas (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ok Sohail F. khan (talk) 21:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction Noted

Raises possible contradiction with:

"While many writers refer to a mere list of instructions or tips as a tutorial, this usage can be misleading."

This seems to go against the rest of the article. While technically correct, common usage of the word "Tutorial" for list of instructions means that the article cannot simply be re-written without mentioning this in the intro. --Zebas (talk) 20:08, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@[User:Zebas] Are you essentially advocating for, in your contribution of ==Contradiction Noted= , for the article [Page:Tutorial], that a Disambiguation Page be created, as a result of the contradiction? I agree with your assessment, however I am unsure of what is being suggested to rectify this matter.

Also, since your contribution indicates a potential issue pertaining to Contradictions, this would be a good Sub-Topic for me to include a potential Contradiction I believe I located, for which I had placed a Comment on the Aforementioned article, which states, “Did the author intend to use the word “tuition,” or based on the context, should it rather read, “tutoring?” [AdminHelp] Mark Halsey 20:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)Mark Halsey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markhalsey (talk • contribs)

Expand section on supervision

Perhaps someone would be kind enough to expand on the section dealing with supervision at Cambridge and Oxford. That is a particularly interesting area worthy of elaboration. (Unfortunately I've had no experience with them so can't contribute). Nicknz 04:59, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe supervision is purely a Cambridge term. At Oxford they are referred to as tutorials, abbreviated to 'tut' in writing (but pronounced 'tute'). Bhuna71 (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UK schooling

Should a section about the use of tutorials in the UK secondary schooling system? Englishnerd 20:23, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Australia

There's a bit about Australia here and it is just about right, but it should be pointed out that tutes tend to be the most important part of the course. Lectures are often optional while missing a tutorial is frowned upon to the extent where your grade suffers if you miss more than one or two, work is marked by your tutor, any oral presentations are presented in and marked in your tutorial etc.

Same at Oxford, but only for some subjects. I went to about 12 lectures in total during my 3 years of law at Oxford, but the only time I missed a tutorial was when I was actually in hospital. My scientist and mathematician contemporaries, though, went to nearly all their lectures and said they would not have been able to pass the courses without doing so. Bhuna71 (talk) 00:54, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Internal link to 'context'

I have removed an internal link to 'context', since there is currently no page that I can find discussing the relevant sense of that term. A new page could be created with a title such as Context (education) or the like. Alternately, a link could be added to Wiktionary (wikt:context). Cnilep (talk) 01:28, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tutorials and Coaching

How does a tutorial (for example at Oxford or Cambridge) differ from a coaching session at a crammer's establishment? Aren't both intended to get the best possible exam results for their pupils? It would be useful to have some comments on this, even if the formulation of the question is a shade provocative. Norvo (talk) 00:26, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

Modern Tutorial.jpg

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 23:36, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]