Talk:Twinz

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Musicians

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Musicians (assessed as Low-importance).

Hip hop Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pointless information

This type of content is not added to every article about a music artist. "This X group/rapper first appeared on X's album in XXXX". That's just stupid. Tasc0 ^{It's a zero!} 23:24, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's entirely relevant to add information about a group's appearances on other artists' recordings. This is the subject of plenty of discographical works, both paper and online, and I fail to see why you are so adamant about it not being included here. Chubbles (talk) 16:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because is worthless. Tasc0 ^{It's a zero!} 22:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

thats stupid its useful to me made me give them a listen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.127.163.248 (talk) 18:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly a little knowledge does not hurt, yes you do not have to list every song they appeared in; but at least notable songs._{~wefunkGfunk (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

I don't see how this song is notable. Is it even a single? Tasc0 ^{It's a zero!} 00:40, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, you know what. If anything, then it most likely would belong on a trivia section of the article._{~wefunkGfunk (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Perfectly apt in the main narrative of the article. Chubbles (talk) 02:36, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't agree with none of you both. This information should be removed. Trivias don't follow the Wikipedia policy. Tasc0 ^{It's a zero!} 23:04, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's certainly nice to see that Tasc0 has been banned from this website. I had a similar 'discussion' with Tasc0 over the exact same sentence (In 1997 the duo appeared on Warren G's second album...). As we can see he isn't the best at having a reasonable debate. In fact, I was considering 'reporting him' (if there is such a thing) back when he first started an 'edit war' on this article. Instead, I decided it might be a long and complicated process and probably wasn't worth my time, win or lose. Therefore I simply stopped visiting Wikipedia to contribute or edit pages. About a year and a half later I decided to return to contributing to Wikipedia, although as someone who creates or starts new pages. Anyway I'm pleased that all this time later my one sentence has been reinstated into the article, especially since the article in general is quite brief and could use lot's of beefing up. Thanks to Chubbles. Cheers, Qlazarus (talk) 07:43, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He was incredibly difficult to deal with. Sadly, his spirit lives on in others, so if you are hoping to come back to editing without constant niggling dispute, you'll probably be disappointed. But best of luck editing in any case. Chubbles (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]