Talk:Unholy Alliance: Radical Islam and the American Left

I think the article needs more than just a lengthy quote from the text of the book, which in and of itself is questionable in terms of copyright issues. Ëvilphoenix ^Burn! 04:49, August 16, 2005 (UTC)

Wait, is that a quote ripped straight from the book? In that case, just slap a copyvio over it and have done with it. A quick google search seems to indicate that it comes from this interview and not book, though... In any case it's clearly too long of a quote. On the other hand, I question the presence of the npov tag--the article doesn't say enough to be npov, and the pov of the book isn't relevent. I suppose you could argue that an article that basically just quotes a controversal book's author is inherently npov, though... Aquillion 01:35, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The quote serves an unintended purpose: it reveals the author's complete lack of skill. I don't think there could be a more effective way to ridicule this particular piece of tripe than to let the author's words damn him.Eric TF Bat 23:37, 30 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

May I suggest that not everyone shares your personal opinions of the writings of this author.--CltFn 00:35, 1 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it says quote from the author, and doesn't neccessarily imply it came from the book itself. Эйрон Кинни 03:55, 15 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Have added the spam tag to this page as it has no content per se and has seen no improvement in some time. --Black Butterfly 11:36, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]