Talk:United States Curling Association

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Curling High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Curling, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of curling on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CurlingWikipedia:WikiProject CurlingTemplate:WikiProject CurlingCurling articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale.

History Section Shows Biases

The last three paragraphs of the history section appear to show significant biases against USCA in light of the dismissal of Jeff Plush as CEO and removal of the GNCC at a member organization last year.

In the third to last paragraph, the writer of this portion makes insinuations about the USA Curling policies and decisions, stating that it's decision to remove the GNCC was "heavy-handed" and that hiring Jeff Plush in 2020 was "another controversial act" that it performed. While I am not disagreeing with these sentiments or anyone's ability to see these events in these ways, it seems as if it is written in a way to push the reader into believing USA Curling is bad.

It continues more egregiously in the next paragraph when it calls the press release given by the USA Curling Board a "weak, generic statement." Again, I do not necessarily disagree with these sentiments, but this language is very charged and again reinforces that USA Curling is bad.

I am not the most active on wikipedia so forgive me if I am wrong, but it was my belief that this site exists to give the facts on a given topic, not force an opinion in a specific way. This language I point out very clearly exists to paint USA Curling in a bad light. It's important to report on the mistakes of USA Curling, but let's let their actions speak for themselves rather than attempting to make the reader feel one way or another, especially in issues that are very divisive and don't appear to have a clear right and wrong. CurlN'Stuff (talk) 22:16, 26 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]