Talk:University of Waikato
|WikiProject Universities||(Rated B-class)|
|WikiProject New Zealand||(Rated B-class, Mid-importance)|
|The content of University of Waikato Faculty of Law was merged into University of Waikato on 28 May 2016. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see ; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.|
Given the existence of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Great_Race_(rowing) would it not be more appropriate to have a link to that page and move the information about the 'great' race there?
Botrytis 09:03, 10 October 2005 (UTC)
I don't think DAG Technology should be merged. The University of Waikato initially created it - that's all - and now it's made by Endace.
Imcdnzl 04:21, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:University of Waikato logo.svg
Image:University of Waikato logo.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
Premier business school?
A claim is made that the University of Waikato School of Management is New Zealand's premier business school. Two references are given for this.  supports this claim, but is obviously written by the university, not by an independent third-party. Language on this site such as "We are committed to providing..." make it very clear that this is simply advertising. Other pages on topuniversities.com are not just advertising, but this page is unacceptable as a reference.
The other reference given is a University of Waikato republishing of data from the Performance Based Research Fund. PBRF information is reliable, but this page doesn't make the claims the anon is making (the word "premier" does not appear on that page at all).
The anon claims in an edit summary that "QS rankings website cannot just write unfactual information, it is considered illegal", but this is written by the University, not by QS, and the University can make marketing claims about itself. However, Wikipedia is not the place to do this.-gadfium 18:40, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Compared to the wikipedia entries for other NZ universities, this entry is out of date and missing important information. We would like to update the entry and bring in a range of new/different subheadings to bring this entry more into line with other university information on Wikipedia. This would involve a complete rewrite of much of the information (and the removal of some of the hyperbole currently in the entry), and I want to check via this talk page that this would be acceptable to Wikipedians. 184.108.40.206 (talk) 01:28, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for coming to this talk page first. I do not have a problem in principle with you updating and restructuring the article, as long as the material you add is neutrally worded and backed by sources. We prefer sources which are independent of the University, but for non-controversial matters a University source is okay. If you have not already done so, please read our guideline related to conflict of interest.
- While you are not obliged to do so, I suggest you create an account for this work, so we can distinguish between your edits and those of other people at the University. Your account should represent yourself, not the University (so an account named "University of Waikato" would not be acceptable, but "Jane/John at Waikato" would be), and you do not need to give your real name or identifying details, but it would be polite to add a note on your user page saying that you work for the University (if this is the case).
- Please wait for a week before making major changes to the article to give any other editors a chance to respond to your request.-gadfium 02:56, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- thanks for the advice; I have now created an account and declared my COI as suggested. I welcome other comments and will be ready to upload the revised article in a week's time. Waikato Wordwizard (talk) 01:14, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
I have proposed that this festival be merged into this article as it fails to reach the necessary notability for festivals under WP:GNG. It is also in line with Otago University's O week which is included within that University's main article. NealeFamily (talk) 01:03, 26 July 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose:it occurs at the same time as, but doesn't seem restricted to, the University orientation week. Hence, independent; independent notability comes from the newspaper coverage of the event.Klbrain (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
While I appreciate the need for the use of several Maori words in this article, since it is written for speakers of other languages (English in this case), in my opinion, each Maori term should have a translation into English. This is essential to readability.Fredricwilliams (talk) 16:44, 24 June 2015 (UTC)