Talk:Unnilunium

Rcat

I'm now unsure; was this name even used in the past? 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:34, 2 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@1234qwer1234qwer4: The systematic names for elements 101, 102, and 103 are mentioned as "minor alternatives" in the original IUPAC recommendation. I am not sure if anyone actually used them; I would tend to doubt it since the elements already had trivial names. (Note incidentally that the systematic nomenclature was for elements 101 to 999, so unnilnilium for fermium should not actually be allowed. But I suppose it is a reasonable redirect since it is clear what someone typing it in means.) Double sharp (talk) 00:08, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Double sharp: Thanks. My change replacing R from alternative name by R from former name should be reverted then, probably. 1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 12:33, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]