Talk:Up An' Atom

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force

Aviation: Aircraft

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Man, who wrote this?

This article claims: "'Up and at 'em,' meaning 'There is a lot of work to be done,'" Huh? Clearly someone went to Dictonary.com and misquoted the definition: "Get going, get busy, as in Up and at 'em—there's a lot of work to be done." In other words, they took the example sentence and used it for the definition as opposed to the definition itself. Kind of like looking up the definition of excited and seeing the usage example, "he was excited to see his team win" and then defining excited as "seeing his team win." BTW, punctuation usually goes inside the quotes. Oh well, at least some wikidiot didn't rewrite the article in UK English. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.129.224.141 (talk) 11:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]