Talk:Valid claim

Editing problems

I am having problems with the computer today, so I am giving up finishing it today and will complete this stub later. Bearian 20:38, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

I won't trouble you or read through all the sources just yet before you are finished but I'm concerned that the article may not reflect any actual subject of law, but rather a common English usage of a claim that happens to be valid, or validly made. In patent law for example, I don't know of any distinction between a valid claim and an invalid claim. They are both the same, except one happens to prevail (thus, invalid) and one does not (valid). One could say that about any legal claim. In that context the issue collapses down to the question of validity, which we already have an article for. At most this subject would deserve a brief mention if validity operates differently in law than it does in, say, philosophy or logic. BTW, I would suggest you not link to attorney-run glossary/dictionary pages (which are promotions in a fashion for their creators) if there are more reliable sources available. this one is a dead link. Wikidemo 21:33, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Valid claim. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

PCH +app. Patricia Ann Evans Hays claim

Super prizes 15,000,000.prize of A Lifetime authorized prizefunds 2603:9001:900:34D8:7161:AD61:E299:8A22 (talk) 01:15, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Claim requirements heren

PCH+app claim multiple chances to win these authorized prize funds:claim 25+entries to win a 15,000,000.prize of a lifetime. In just week's . 2603:9001:900:34D8:7161:AD61:E299:8A22 (talk) 01:28, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Is that all? What more do I need?

Do I need a validation number? 2603:9001:900:34D8:7161:AD61:E299:8A22 (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]