Talk:VeganBurg

Veganism and Vegetarianism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Vegetarian_Society_(Singapore)#Vegetarian_and_Vegan_Restaurants_in_Singapore|Vegetarian and Vegan Restaurants in Singapore]] The anchor (#Vegetarian_and_Vegan_Restaurants_in_Singapore) has been deleted by other users before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Previous AfD

This is one of my first articles I wrote from scratch, I saw there was some history about this page a few years ago, therefore I tryed to be very carefully about using to many references to the restaurant/company homepage. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VeganBurg from 9 January 2014 (UTC). Added --Never stop exploring (talk) 12:41, 3 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sources

As of Special:PermanentLink/662268597.

Ref 1: vegetarian-society.org

This is a forum and not a reliable source. It can be used to support facts, but not to show notability.

Ref 2: travel.cnn.com

Although this source is reliable, it isn't an in-depth source. It has ~~comments~~ interviews with the creator, which is not independent. The rest of the content is nothing to show why this is notable.

Ref 3: straitstimes.com

Seems like an ok reference. But alone it's no good.

Ref 4: ecorazzi.com

Seems to be a blog and not a news item. Not known for fact checking nor peer-reviewed or has editorial oversight.

Ref 5: hungrygowhere.com

Provides no real information which is of value to Wikipedia. It is not a reliable source since it is just a posting/listing in a resturant-database.

Ref 6: foursquare.com

See Ref 5 above. Also not an independent source.

Ref 7: vegetarian-society.org

Only mentions the subject in passing, and is not in-depth to prove notability.

Ref 8: foodpanda.sg

See Ref 5 above.

Ref 9: veganburg.com

The subjects own website. Not independent nor reliable, per WIkipedias standards, since they are out to promote the subject rather than to tell the "truth".

Ref 10: sassymamasg.com

See Ref 5 above.

Sources checked by (t) Josve05a (c) 04:02, 15 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]