Talk:Venetoclax

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Venetoclax article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Medicine Mid‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Venetoclax.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Recent edits

User: EmilyDaley please stop editing a bit and read WP:MEDMOS and WP:MEDRS carefully before you continue. The sources you are using are not OK. The sections are not correct now, and we don't refer to "patients", and there are a bunch of other issues. Will give you a chance to fix before I revise. But almost nothing you have done so far is keepable. If you have questions about MEDMOS or MEDRS please ask. Jytdog (talk) 02:53, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User: Jytdog I will work on changing and editing. Thank you for the help and for the information. EmilyDaley (talk) 15:59, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I did a quick pass through and organized sections per MEDMOS and removed non-MEDRS refs that were being used to support WP:Biomedical information. There is lots to do to improve this still. Jytdog (talk) 20:49, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Content a bit outdated, can help in revising. KimmoPorkka (talk) 14:26, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong structure

The structure displayed is wrong. The SMILES string is correct though. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.121.5.227 (talk) 17:34, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]