Talk:Vettaikkaaran

	Film portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India: Cinema

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
	This redirect is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup.

Disambiguation

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles

Move?

Vettaikaaran → Vettaikkaran and Vettaikkaaran (1964 film) → Vettaikkaaran — The two film title are apparently spelt (slightly) differently, so dablinks between the two should be sufficient. The dab page would be better at the otherwise unused "Vettaikkaran". PC78 (talk) 13:34, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This difference in spelling is not very noticeable: put the date on both article names? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 17:53, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree with User:Anthony Appleyard. Put the date on both article names and then have all of the (undated) spellings link to one DAB page. — AjaxSmack 18:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Agree with User:Anthony Appleyard having the 2 films and their dab page at 3 different variations of the same spelling that are highly likely to be indistinguishable to most general readers of Wikipedia is a recipe for utter confusion. I'm certainly confused already. --Rogerb67 (talk) 03:00, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Are the variations of the name really different Tamil language titles or just different transliterations? If the latter, a dab page is in order. Jafeluv (talk) 11:34, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think we can knock this on the head. The 2009 film article was moved as suggested above, and I have no objection to doing things that way. PC78 (talk) 00:00, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So... am I correct that there's nothing left to move here? -GTBacchus^(talk) 04:39, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. PC78 (talk) 20:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]