Talk:Vili and Vé

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Mythology / Norse mythology  (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Norse mythology work group.


This should probably be moved to Odin, Vili and Ve or similar, because any discussion of Vili and Ve will actually be a discussion of that triad. dab (𒁳) 14:52, 20 December 2007 (UTC)


Is it me, or did I miss the references in this article? Is the alliteration in proto-norse an accepted fact, or is it original research? Likewise, the references to the Exeter book strike strongly of original research — the entire Exeter book is alliterative, so it's no surprise to find a sentence with Woden which alliterates with other Ws. Emendations to suit a theory are generally highly discouraged in Old English studies.Martin Turner (talk) 23:30, 2 February 2008 (UTC) Also note that the bibliography (which is not connected to the text) is only of out-of-date studies, from the period when emendations to suit theories were rife.Martin Turner (talk) 23:32, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Your criticism is valid and I tend to find that Wikipedia has a very severe problem with such original research in these areas. References, people - solid, referable, reputable references! If you can correct it, you are most welcome to. :bloodofox: (talk) 12:19, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
While I am not completely certain about the alliteration in Proto-Norse, it did alliterate in Proto-Germanic. I've added a citation to Simek that roughly states such, but the the line likely needs to be rewritten. My current revision adds links to Wiktionary as well. Yugure (talk) 03:27, 30 June 2015 (UTC)