Talk:Vincent Square

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Historic sites, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of historic sites on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Historic sitesWikipedia:WikiProject Historic sitesTemplate:WikiProject Historic sitesHistoric sites articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Vincent Square Area[edit]

Edit at 08:41, 20 July 2009 by 81.144.152.66 claims that the area is 3.16 acres, yet not a single internet source can confirm this. All other sources I can find claim it is (as previously stated in the article) between 10 and 13 acres.

10 acres: http://www.buildingtalk.com/news/buf/buf120.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_School

13 acres: http://www.westminsterconservatives.co.uk/node/72 http://www.getahundred.com/blog/archives/264 http://en.allexperts.com/e/v/vi/vincent_square.htm

Pete741 (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Above cited small difference is self-evidently as one set includes and the other omits the small frontage zones, pavements and roads, but "3" is totally wrong, simply use a measure tool such as Library of Scotland maps.- Adam37 Talk 14:35, 23 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]