Talk:Voter registration drive

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Politics

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles

Freedom of speech

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles

This redirect was nominated at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion on 2019 June 7. The result of the discussion was retarget to Voter registration campaign.

I'm a bit angry--I think this stub shows why we need real names for editors

Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Rock the Vote article seems to show that Rock the Vote is upfront about being partison. The apparent smear that I deleted from this article damages Wikipedia and damages trust in general. It would happen much less if editors had real names as handles, so that they had to take responsibility for their actions.Rich (talk) 12:58, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hmm i must have been blind! Rock the Vote is registered as nonpartisan, according to the article's first sentence. Sorry.Rich (talk) 21:52, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dated

I was going to add the year (2012) to the dates of the Oregon campaign, but is it worth the bother? The two examples now (2016) seem arbitrary and somewhat dated. Oh, and about that 33% increase: 33% of what? Dumbox (talk) 07:03, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Voter registration drive. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140829032217/http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0034.html to http://www.atlantaprogressivenews.com/news/0034.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:38, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]