Talk:Washington State Route 168

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Good article Washington State Route 168 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
December 25, 2010 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject United States / Washington / Eastern Washington task force (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Washington - Eastern Washington task force.
 
WikiProject U.S. Roads (Rated GA-class, Low-importance)
U.S. Roads WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Topics
 GA  This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 168/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer:CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    "Forrest Roads" in RD.
    Fixed. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    No reference for the final sentence of RD.
    Doesn't really need one, look at any map to see any detour. --Admrboltz (talk) 00:23, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image of the area would be nice, but not necessary for GAs.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Just fix the two comments and its all good. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 20:22, 25 December 2010 (UTC)
Looks all good. Pass. Merry Christmas! –CGTalk 06:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)