Talk:Wenjack (novella)

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This page has been created in association with https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UBC/ENG470D-003_Canadian_Studies_(2017) We welcome all input. -- Pamychoi (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Criticisms

The brief statement on criticisms, with references, has been deleted under auspices of WP:RS - however, criticisms are referenced using a National Post article, which seems to be both a "reliable, published source" and a "significant minority view." The criticism does not invalidate the work or the author's aims, but rather is leveled at his methodology, which is relevant. Dingdongwitchisdead (talk) 01:25, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am not even seeing any mention of this novel in the National Post article. Furthermore, the author is not, as far as I can tell, an expert; why should his personal opinions about this be WP:DUE to weigh equal to the higher-quality news coverage you're trying to compare it to? Finally, a single opinion piece is not a "significant" view - it's the opinion of one random person. The goal for a reception section is to weigh significant reception, not to list every opinion anyone holds everywhere. If it's a significant opinion, find other RSes that carry it. But either way, neither source (not the non-WP:RS nor the national post) even mentions Boyden's novel once, so how could they possibly be appropriate here? --Aquillion (talk) 23:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mcengl470, Llnguyen, Andersson39, Pamychoi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 15:15, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]