Talk:What a Way to Go!

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: British / American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Untitled

The credits seem a little long. Should we at least remove the "bit part" entries? RJFJR 22:07, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think the article is written as an advertisement (granted, I wrote most of it). It's a summary of the plot, which is a bit complex.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Theoriste (talk • contribs) 22:05, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's notable that all these other actors were uncredited and that the movie had some of the most popular male stars of the day. Also, the section of "Film Critics" seems a little short. "John Simon of The New Leader wrote 'The mildest thing that can be said about this film is that it is an abomination'.[24]" Is all that anyone had to say about a film that was nominated for several awards. It is a fine satire on riches and fame. Wastrel Way (talk) Eric