Talk:Wheeler Ridge Interchange
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Wheeler Ridge Interchange article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This article was nominated for deletion on 14 December 2015. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Future Interstate 9 Section
[edit]Shouldn't Interstate 9 be added in a Future section? It is the proposed redesignation of California 99. Allen (talk) 23:23, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
- Only if there are multiple reliable secondary sources for such a thing, not roadgeek websites tossing the idea around. Even if you have chambers of commerce or advocacy groups tossing the idea around, if they aren't taken seriously by the press, I wouldn't add it. Imzadi 1979 → 23:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class California road transport articles
- Low-importance California road transport articles
- C-Class Road transport articles
- Low-importance Road transport articles
- California road transport articles
- C-Class U.S. road transport articles
- Low-importance U.S. road transport articles
- U.S. road transport articles