Talk:White Night (2009 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean cinema task force.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. harej 08:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

White Night (Korean) → White Night (film) — Article was moved from this title because: "Old title to easily confused with the several White Nights films". However, there is no other use of this exact title, and per WP:NCF, White Night (film) is the correct page title; "(Korean)" is vague and not standard as a disambiguator for film articles. A hatnote can be used to avoid confusion with other similar titled films. PC78 (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.

Support, clearly. The current disambiguator is very much non-standard. Powers ^T 14:07, 24 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. However, note that, according to List of South Korean films of 1968, there was a 1968 film by the same name. — AjaxSmack 02:08, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Alternate suggestion move it to White Knight (2009 film) instead, per AjaxSmack's finding of another film, and that there are other films on the dab page. 76.66.193.119 (talk) 04:28, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- White Night (2009 film), you mean? :) I'm not a big fan of preemptively disambiguating page titles, since there is no guarantee that we will ever have an article on that other film. But I wouldn't object if others felt it was necessary. PC78 (talk) 11:39, 25 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Um yeah, oops, sorry about the typo. :) 76.66.193.119 (talk) 03:47, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree that preemptive disambiguation is not needed, especially in this case where the 1968 film is from a source of dubious provenance. Even when there are two articles on films of the same name, disambiguation by year is not always used. Note the existence of articles called Independence Day (film) and Independence Day (1983 film). — AjaxSmack 23:11, 26 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There are at least 2 films called "White Nights", and that is near enough to be in the same disambig list. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 20:27, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support originally proposed title, per standard naming conventions. Propaniac (talk) 18:44, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Synopsis

That's no synopsis, that's nothing but a spoiler! It starts with the ending of the film. Horrible article!!! Please change. ~~ tcgit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.93.66.174 (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]