Talk:William Parr (died 1483)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Military history: Biography / British / European / Medieval

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	Medieval warfare task force (c. 500 – c. 1500)

Title of Page

Perhaps we should think about re-naming this page as Sir William was never titled 1st Baron Parr of Kendal. That title was bestowed upon his grandson, William Parr, 1st Marquess of Northampton in 1538. This William Parr is usually known as Sir William Parr of Kendal KG as he was one of only two gentlemen made Knight of the Garter in the late reign of Edward IV. What do people think about this? He did receive 1/4 of the barony but technically was not suo jure baron. -- Lady Meg (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are absolutely correct, Lady Meg; and as you have had no reply for nearly six years, I have gone ahead with the move. Reliable sources agree with you; it probably stems from misunderstanding the grant of a portion of the fee of a barony, as being a grant of a barony itself. Still got to change the transcluded ancestors chart, and the image in the info box to reflect his newly-acquired status. Cheers, O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 12:54, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edits by User

Noticed the user HistoryAmma spammed the article. Anyone feel like correcting it? Not even sure the statements are factual. It’s been awhile since I checked the page. Can’t just revert edit unfortunately. Lady Meg (talk) 10:59, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]