Talk:Winchester, Richland County, Ohio

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

Ghost towns Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ghost towns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ghost towns on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ghost townsWikipedia:WikiProject Ghost townsTemplate:WikiProject Ghost townsGhost town articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Winchester, Richland County, Ohio be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Ohio may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Merge into Richland County, Ohio

The main article for this page says that Winchester was "an attempt" to build a town, and that the whole community "never amounted to more than a few homes". It does not appear to be a community of any historical significance, and propose merging it into Richland County, Ohio as a historical footnote. Tim Pierce (talk) 15:58, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why? Ghost towns are as deserving of articles as any other communities; if it got a name and settlers, and if there are no residents anymore, it sounds like a ghost town to me. Nyttend (talk) 00:19, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Because it apparently wasn't ever even really a community in the first place but a failed outpost. Tim Pierce (talk) 02:15, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The GNIS reference that I just added considers it to have been a community. Nyttend (talk) 04:10, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That GNIS reference does not even use the word "community." It is a statistical record that lists Winchester as a "populated place," which appears to be a demographic term meaning nothing more than "people lived there." Unlike other ghost towns documented in Wikipedia, this one apparently did not even exist for more than a few years, and the references I have seen cannot even confirm that it lasted that long.

Please note that I am not proposing that the article be deleted. I agree one hundred percent that the information listed here is verifiable through reliable sources. I am suggesting that, unlike most other Wikipedia articles on ghost towns, this one was not significant enough even in its heyday to warrant a separate article. One of the very sources on which this article hangs its claim to notability says that the settlement "never amounted to anything." What better argument for merging this article into a more notable one? Tim Pierce (talk) 04:53, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, Stuartyeates (t c) convinced me that having a one-to-one correspondence between authoritative databases like GNIS and Wikipedia carries enough benefit to keep individual articles like this for populated places, so I withdraw my merge suggestion. Tim Pierce (talk) 05:17, 20 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]