Talk:Women's World Chess Championship 2015

Participants

For case of A. Muzychuk, Dzagnidze and Lagno, all qualified by ratings and also E12, organizer will choose next 3 of ratings or next 3 from European championship? Demon Witch (talk) 16:52, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Good question. Page 2 of regulation read The average rating list has priority if a player qualifies either from the rating list or a zonal/continental event. So i guess there should be three replacements from the E12 way.? -Koppapa (talk) 17:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, E12 is first choice and three replacements from ratings (Muzychuk, Stefanova and Tan). بنفش من شما را دوست دارم (talk) 14:53, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work adding all the players. Thanks. -Koppapa (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

original qualifiers

useful? -Koppapa (talk) 08:33, 27 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

prose

Someone able to add some sentences per round? Like highest seed out, interessting tie-breaks (armageddons) and so on. -Koppapa (talk) 07:25, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 4 July 2015

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved by DESiegel (talk · contribs). I've now moved the talk page as well. Jenks24 (talk) 18:04, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Women's World Chess Championship 2015 (knock-out) → Women's World Chess Championship 2015 – As the later match has been postponed to 2016 this is now the only championship taking place this year. I believe this should be an uncontroversial technical move. PatGallacher (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. It doesn't ened to be discussed. Once the redirect is deleted by an amdmin, feel free to move. -Koppapa (talk) 06:20, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This now appears to have been done, the move request should be closed. PatGallacher (talk) 23:49, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.