|This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the WordPad article.|
|WikiProject Microsoft Windows / Computing||(Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)|
WordPad Pros and Cons
- somewhat easy to learn
- only somewhat easy to learn. It must be one of the simplest word Processors in existence, anything that you can do in it is very easy and requires only a few clicks.
- somewhat compatible file format
- While it doesn't support many more advanced Word Processor files, the rtf file format it uses by default is compatible with virtually everything. It also correctly supports Unix, Mac, and DOS line endings, and can be set to write files in any of the formats.
- no semantic markup
- This is a fault of the .rtf format. The RTF files generated by Word are far more messey than those produced by WordPad because they try to make the file look like a word document, and so have huge amounts of extra markup, just llike word HTML does.
- no structure
my windows vista randomly started reading my wordpad document out loud in a monotone voice. it actually pronounced everything right and paused at the end of sentences. however, i have no idea how i instigated this. could someone please tell me what i did? - kate —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 184.108.40.206 (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC).
- Well I'd like to remind you that there's a lot of forums and Yahoo! Answers for you to ask these types of questions.
- One tip: Google "Accessibility options in VIsta and SPeech options."
- Hope I've helped out.
- Tangmeisterjr (talk) 01:13, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
Word pad can display tables if they are present in the rtf file, it simply has no means of editing them.
WordPad in Windows 7
I have added an entry called 'Future versions' where I mention the redesign of WordPad shown in Windows 7 M3. I also added an image already uploaded to Wikipedia from the Windows 7 wiki. Dom (talk) 10:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
Handy hint: I've found that it's possible to copy over the old XP-era wordpad.exe to a Windows 7 computer and use it there in preference to the new version. I like to use WordPad for quick-'n-dirty editing, and The Ribbon is counterproductive here. WHPratt (talk) 17:58, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
An image on this page may be deleted
This is an automated message regarding an image used on this page. The image File:Wordpad icon (Windows 7).png, found on WordPad, has been nominated for deletion because it does not meet Wikipedia image policy. Please see the image description page for more details. If this message was sent in error (that is, the image is not up for deletion, or was left on the wrong talk page), please contact this bot's operator. STBotI (talk) 15:20, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- new america today is —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk) 16:40, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Is it encyclopedic to have pro's and con's, even at the discussion page? Note that's not even a discussion, it just sits there almighty-ly. We are not PCMag, or some software review webpage. A section like that could be included, if we get the proper sources to back it up. And still, we would need to use "some people, including XXXXX and YYYY", etc... 18.104.22.168 (talk) 05:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)