Talk:Word sense

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Linguistics: Applied Linguistics / Philosophy of language

	Linguistics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Applied Linguistics Task Force.
	This article is supported by Philosophy of language task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Philosophy: Logic / Language Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Logic
	Philosophy of language

The link to "I don’t believe in word senses" is not working. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.76.146.175 (talk) 17:09, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Contradiction

The lead first says that senses are meanings and then that senses have meanings... --ExperiencedArticleFixer (talk) 16:56, 24 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Example for narrow broad understanding of a word

Doesn't the example show exactly the opposite of what a sentence earlier is claimed? That the public has a broader understanding of a word and experts have a narrower sense. The example shows exactly the opposite as it shows that in this case experts have a broader sense of orthography and the public a narrower one. Or am I mistaken? DerFärber (talk) 07:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]