Talk:Writing FAST

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

This page sounds like an advert!

Proposed Deletion[edit]

This page simply seems like an advert.

Don't get me wrong - I have the book. Bought it years ago. It's OK.

However, the book is non-notable. My reasons are:

  • There are certainly millions of ISBN numbers allocated .. not all of them should get a page in Wikipedia
  • There are probably millions of 'how to write' books .. so clearly simply being yet another book on how to write a book isn't notable.
  • Simply reaching one of the many 'best' lists for a brief moment on Amazon isn't notable either ...

(eg: & ) Remember that the graphs on the 2nd link appear upside down because a low rank is good .. a high is very bad.)

  • If we DO consider that Amazon sales results are a metric of notability, then just look at the Amazon data.

It currently has a rank of #318,507 That is an incredibly poor rank. As a comparison point,'Learn To Play Fingerstyle Solos for Ukulele' (which is probably a good book but also incredibly non-notable) has a Amazon rank of about 38,000.

In other words, if you listed books by Amazon popularity there are almost a quarter of a million books that are less popular than that riveting title about the Ukulele ... but each of those quarter of a million books would still be more popular than the subject of this Wikipedia article !

Clearly the book is non-notable.

What about counter-arguments?

Is there an element that makes it notable? Perhaps. Inside the book it points out that it was written by someone who had never written a book before. ie: It is a book on 'how to write a book' written by someone who had never written a book!

I have a few 'how to write' books and that is the first time I've seen that.

13:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by (talk)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page[edit]

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

    Triggered by \barticles(?:base|vana)\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:43, 8 December 2013 (UTC)