Talk:Wrong Is Right

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Fair use rationale for Image:Wrong is right.jpg

Image:Wrong is right.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Too bad that this movie wasn't understood in that time. Today, probably it would have been seen as 'predictive' of our XXI century and particularly, about the 2001 kamikaze attacks. The ingradients are all there: kamikazes, islamis, dictator, enbedded press, mass-media manipoltions, politicians, nuclear (WMD)s. Even if quite obsolescent in shape, it's really a prophetic work if seen after sept 2001, i'd say. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.104.203.37 (talk) 13:32, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Utterly Forgotten Film

This picture made quite a stir in its day, largely negative, but remains shockingly forgotten today. It's one of those movies no one ever seems to mention under any circumstances despite the presence of Sean Connery in the lead. Chaneykarlofflugosi (talk) 17:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]