Talk:Wu Shu Kwan
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Old discussion
[edit]Come on, someone has got to have some more info about our style ;-) wu shu kwan is great only been at it for 4-5 months and i love it!!8-)—Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.92.8 (talk • contribs)
yeah, simple go to the official website www.wushukwan.com—Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.1.144.156 (talk • contribs)
Redirect
[edit]I don't think the current subject of this page is notable. I redirected it rather than just AfDing it. To those who wish to see it remain as is, can you provide evidence that the subject meets WP:N? JJL (talk) 13:59, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- I have cleaned & tagged it but unless it gets fixed up it may be headed for AfD --Nate1481 12:00, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
- Yes, it certainly is improved but I still question the notability. I couldn't find anything at the GWR site to verify those claims [1]. JJL (talk) 12:53, 5 September 2008 (UTC)
Those reverting the redirect: Can you provide evidence of notability for this martial art, using reliable sources? If not, would it be preferable to have the article deleted rather than redirected? JJL (talk)