Jump to content

Talk:X&Y/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Lead
Background
Recording
Critical reaction
Commercial performance

A bit to do, but I'll put it on hold. Peanut4 (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we're done. --Efe (talk) 13:22, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Good work, and the improvements during the GA process have been great. The lead will need to be expanded over time especially if you get more info. And hopefully you can get more info about the origins of the album name. Otherwise I would either get a peer review or ask for independent assistance to see what more could be done to try and go for an WP:FAC. A lot of good work has been done recently on some Coldplay articles. I would be great if you could get them all up towards FAC and perhaps even an FTC. Well done, all the best with this article. Peanut4 (talk) 17:09, 5 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Peanut. Blue and I are collaborating, actually. --Efe (talk) 05:31, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]