Talk:X-Men Forever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Comics / Marvel (Rated Start-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Checklist icon
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by Marvel Comics work group.
 

Critical response[edit]

I was trying to gather some reaction and critical response for the series. It's not much but three different reviews from IGN gave reviews ranging from okay to poor. The reviews are from early on in the series, and there were no reviews of the collected editions. Other reviews may have judged the serious better.

Sales figures might be interesting, and that the series is still ongoing suggests some level of commercial success.
Claremont describes X-men Forever a success and that it lead to Marvel revisting other old storylines in the same way, including a New Mutants Forever mini-series. The article is from April 2010, and mentions some of the X-men Forever stories from the preceeding year. -- Horkana (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Sales: issue one sold out, and was reprinted. -- Horkana (talk) 05:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)

Sources[edit]

X-men Forever announced at New York Comic Con.

Although slightly different from the quote in the article the sentiment expressed is the same and this one is sourced:

Mark and I both think that the one significant advantage to all of this is that, unlike X-Men or Uncanny, we're not restricted by the need to keep the characters intact for the corporation. We are actually free to present a world where everyone is at risk.

The quote in the article at the moment seems longer than necessary, it should be enough to say there is a requirement to keep the characters intact, without needing to go on with examples, although again those are available in this source too.
If you did want to extend the quote a bit longer you could combine it with this one that talks about Magneto being dead (although personally I find this impossible to take seriously, given enough time I'm sure Claremont will bring someone back from the dead):

The thing with Forever is we don't have that restriction. If a character is at risk and that character dies, that character is dead, now and forever. And we make that clear right off the bat, if for no other reason than that the preview begins with a memorial service for Magneto.

So I've spent enough time on this for now but there are plenty of sources that can be fit into the article with a bit more work, if anyone is interested in doing so please go ahead. If you look at the wikisource of this page you will see I've formatted most of the sources I've mentioned using citation templates to make it even easier for other editors. Most likely I'll come back and make these fixes myself but others are more than welcome to jump in. -- Horkana (talk) 02:03, 28 January 2011 (UTC)