Talk:XPDL

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Articles for deletion This article was nominated for deletion on January 7, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

(Sabini)[edit]

Who/What is (Sabini) ? Jayvdb 07:47, 21 September 2006 (UTC)

deletion discussion[edit]

XPDL was developed by the Workflow Management Coalition and is in use as a interoperability standard by 30 to 40 products/open source projects today.

The reason it is important is because the future of interoperability of systems over long term transactions depends on this kind of standard, and this is the only one that fits this bill. BPEL is a common comparison, but this article explains the difference: [1]

In my industry, it is probably the most important and relevant standard today. As evidence of this, here is a list of companies/products that implement the standard: [2]

X/Y inclusion[edit]

I use XPDL in my organization and don't find X/Y very useful. It wasn't even included in the first specification, if I remember correctly. Why would it be so near the top of the article? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Exbuzz (talkcontribs) 13:43, 17 February 2007 (UTC).

Multiple Refrences?[edit]

Why there are two Reference headings? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.186.38.171 (talk) 12:23, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on XPDL. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:05, 20 July 2016 (UTC)