Talk:Yugoslav submarine Nebojša

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Yugoslav submarine Nebojša article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

Yugoslav submarine Nebojša is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.

Yugoslav submarine Nebojša is part of the Ships of the Royal Yugoslav Navy series, a featured topic. It is also part of the Hrabri-class submarines series, a featured topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 31, 2015	Good article nominee	Listed
July 4, 2015	Good topic candidate	Promoted
September 27, 2015	WikiProject A-class review	Approved
October 31, 2015	Featured article candidate	Promoted
July 15, 2017	Good topic candidate	Promoted
Current status: Featured article

This article is written in Australian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, realise, program, labour (but Labor Party)) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Yugoslavia Low‑importance

	Yugoslav submarine Nebojša is within the scope of WikiProject Yugoslavia, a collaborative effort to improve the Wikipedia coverage of articles related to Yugoslavia and its nations. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.YugoslaviaWikipedia:WikiProject YugoslaviaTemplate:WikiProject YugoslaviaYugoslavia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Maritime / Balkan / European / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	Balkan military history task force (c. 500–present)
	European military history task force
	World War II task force

Additional information:
/
	This article has passed an A-Class review.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

Clarification

G'day, Peacemaker, I think there is a minor discrepancy in the article. In the body it says "Her surfaced displacement was 1,164 long tons (1,183 t) (1,164 long tons (1,183 t) submerged)", but in the infobox it says "Displacement: 975 long tons (991 t) (surfaced) 1,164 long tons (1,183 t) (submerged)". Could you please clarify which is correct (I think it is the infobox, but I'm only guessing). Otherwise I think the article would rate as C class (it probably needs more coverage of service history: for instance what happened between 1927 and 1941, and did she see any action while attached to the British submarine flotillas?) Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:38, 20 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

G'day, I've just adjusted this myself. Please check that I have corrected the right information as I am only guessing based on the infobox. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry AR, got distracted with something else. You are right. 975 surfaced, 1164 submerged. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 01:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, have a good one. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 01:39, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

8 days at sea?

According to Divine, A. D. (1944). Navies in Exile. New York: E. P. Dutton. pp. 207–09., Nebojša left Kotor after 1800 hours on 17 April and arrived in Suda Bay on 24 April. Srnec (talk) 00:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

that is eight calendar days, is it not? Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 00:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is, but the article currently says that it arrived in Crete on 23 April and I did not interpret "eight days at sea" to mean eight calendar days (I took it to mean roughly 192 hours at sea). I don't have access to the sources cited in the article, so I can't check to see why the discrepancy or who's in error. That's why I just posted the information and didn't speculate. Srnec (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I doubt it was meant to be that exact, but I will look at some sources and add some clarity of I can find it. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 02:11, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]