Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Yugoslav submarine Nebojša

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article promoted by TomStar81 (talk) via MilHistBot (talk) 03:07, 27 September 2015 (UTC) « Return to A-Class review list[reply]

Nominator(s): Peacemaker67 (crack... thump)

Yugoslav submarine Nebojša (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Most of the Yugoslav Navy was captured intact in port during the April 1941 invasion, but Nebojša escaped and joined the Royal Navy, and was returned to the Yugoslavs after the war. Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 23:18, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Image is appropriately licensed. Nikkimaria (talk) 01:32, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

SupportComments: G'day, I made a couple of minor tweaks and have the following suggestions: AustralianRupert (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Support
    • Really not much to find fault with, looks good to me.
    • "She served with the British 2nd Submarine Flotilla in 1942 and the British 3rd Submarine Flotilla in 1943,[1] and she continued serving in the Mediterranean until the end of the war..." The prose is just a little repetitive (specifically "serve" and "serving"). Consider perhaps something like: "She served with the British 2nd Submarine Flotilla in 1942 and the British 3rd Submarine Flotilla in 1943,[1] and continued working in the Mediterranean until the end of the war..." (minor nitpick, suggestion only) Anotherclown (talk) 08:07, 24 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comments. As always, feel free to revert my copyediting. - Dank (push to talk)

Thanks for the review, Dan. Have addressed the nesting. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 09:04, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.