Talk:Zia Haider Rahman
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.
Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors |
Contested deletion
[edit]This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... This is an author page. I haven't set it up myself though I have been updating it frequently trying to put in more information as found on the internet. This page contains information about a new author, the reviews of his book and other minor details of the author, as available.
Please do kindly don't delete the page at this moment of time, but allow us to rectify the problems if any.
--
Suitefrancaise20 (talk) 20:43, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Zia Haider Rahman
[edit]You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
A tag has been placed on Zia Haider Rahman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an acceptable page. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this page is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You are welcome to edit the page to fix this problem, but please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. As well as removing promotional phrasing, it helps to add factual encyclopaedic information to the page, and add citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the page will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Suitefrancaise20 (talk) 20:45, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
This article should not be speedy deleted because...
[edit]This page should not be speedily deleted because...
Have inserted as many links as possible to the content in order to link to other wiki content. waiting for this warning to be taken off
--Suitefrancaise20 (talk) 17:46, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
suitefrancaise20
Maintnence tags
[edit]I have considered marking for deletion, but have decided against it, for now. Explanations for the tags are as follows:
- The article looks too much like an advert because it is mostly reviews of his books;
- These reviews do not encompass the whole subject. You may wish to create articles on each book;
- Marked as Conflict of Interest, because you seem connected to the author in previous statements;
- Contact me if the tag interferes with editing, or if no one personally knows the author.
Please improve the article. Also, The article does not have enough information on the author himself, more information can be added.
Thank you -- Orduin ⋠T⋡ 17:56, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
Reply to Message
[edit]-Don't know the author personally, sourcing material from the internet as and when available
-shortened the reviews
-this might be because of the inexperience of knowing how to write for Wiki. trying my best to keep up with the regulations thanks for your suggestions. is it possible to take the tag off now please.
Suitefrancaise20 (talk) 19:04, 20 December 2014 (UTC) Suitefrancaise20