Talk:zram

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
          This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
WikiProject Computing (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 
WikiProject Linux (Rated C-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
C-Class article C  This article has been rated as C-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Zram or zram[edit]

Hey, Smuckola! As I've described it in my edit summary, "zram" isn't a trademark so the MOS section you've referred to simply doesn't apply. That's just a name of one part of the Linux kernel, and it's mentioned almost everywhere in lowercase. Of course, I'm more than open to discussing this further. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 21:42, 19 May 2015 (UTC)

@Dsimic:Sorry, the fact that they didn't literally file a trademark is irrelevant to the fact that this is a manual of style and not a legal office or a court. Everything else listed in the manual is also listed everywhere as such, which is also not the point. You completely misunderstand the point of the manual. This is how this situation is actually handled everywhere in Wikipedia, as per that manual, which that manual clearly states. The procedure is to say what it actually is in English, and then say "stylized as". Because that's what the word "stylized" means; a language isn't stylization, and an encyclopedia is for the language. I'm simply reading you the manual, as all other articles know.— Smuckola(talk) 21:47, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
No matter what the MOS says, "Zram" with the "z" in uppercase is plain wrong. All our guidelines say that they can be disobliged if that makes Wikipedia better, and "zram" is what's correct. As simple as that. — Dsimic (talk | contribs) 21:53, 19 May 2015 (UTC)