Talk:Zuhayr ibn al-Qayn
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Hi! Please note that the content of this article already has its own article. --Stormbay 02:19, 23 July 2007 (UTC)
Undid last revision
[edit]@FreeatlastChitchat: I undid because I want to edit this part. You can delete the text but you can not delete the source of article. Please undid the sources.Saff V. (talk) 07:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Saff V.: If you are doing extensive edits, feel free to undo my revert. you can also place the under construction template on the article while you edit it. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Recent changes
[edit]Saff V. please explain your recent attempts to add Original research, peacock phrases and weasel words to the article. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- FreeatlastChitchat Why this references are Original research? 1 2 3Saff V. (talk) 07:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Saff V.:One of them is published by Alhoda UK which published "self published" books, so that is not reliable. Furthermore I deleted the text in question according to WP:PEACOCK policy. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: One of them is "self published" books, how others? Yes, text has WP:PEACOCK policy problem and I want solve this problem but you deleted again. Also, I said to you undid the deleted source not text.Saff V. (talk) 08:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: I added one sentence from reliable source.Saff V. (talk) 08:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: I add neutral and reliable sources.Saff V. (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @FreeatlastChitchat: One of them is "self published" books, how others? Yes, text has WP:PEACOCK policy problem and I want solve this problem but you deleted again. Also, I said to you undid the deleted source not text.Saff V. (talk) 08:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Saff V.:One of them is published by Alhoda UK which published "self published" books, so that is not reliable. Furthermore I deleted the text in question according to WP:PEACOCK policy. Regards FreeatlastChitchat (talk) 07:54, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Notability tag
[edit]I added more reliable sources to the article and the article is about notable person. Therefore, we can delete the notability tag.Saff V. (talk) 09:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
- Dying in a notable battle does not make someone notable. Notability is not inherited. Nothing in the article indicates the subject was notable. Edward321 (talk) 00:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Edward321: Sources of article confirm the subject is notable. You must open your eye and see references.Saff V. (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- Please read Wikipedia:Notability (people). All that the article shows is that the subject died in a notable battle. Edward321 (talk) 14:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- @Edward321: Sources of article confirm the subject is notable. You must open your eye and see references.Saff V. (talk) 12:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)