Indoor tanning involves using a device that emits ultraviolet radiation to produce a cosmetic tan.[a] Typically found in tanning salons, gyms, spas, hotels and sporting facilities, and less often in private residences, the most common device is a horizontal tanning bed, also known as a sunbed or solarium. Vertical devices are known as tanning booths or stand-up sunbeds.
First introduced in the 1920s, indoor tanning became popular with white people in the Western world, particularly in Scandinavia, in the late 1970s. The practice finds a cultural parallel in skin whitening in Asian countries, and both support multibillion-dollar industries. Most indoor tanners are women, 16–25 years old, who want to improve their appearance or mood, acquire a pre-holiday tan, or treat a skin condition.
Across Australia, Canada, Northern Europe and the United States, 18.2% of adults, 45.2% of university students, and 22% of adolescents had tanned indoors in the previous year, according to studies in 2007–2012.[b] As of 2010 the indoor-tanning industry employed 160,000 in the United States, where 10–30 million tanners[c] visit 25,000 indoor facilities annually. In the United Kingdom, 5,350 tanning salons were in operation in 2009. From 1997 several countries and US states banned under-18s from indoor tanning. The commercial use of tanning beds was banned entirely in Brazil in 2009 and Australia in 2015.
Indoor tanning is associated with skin aging, sunburn, photodrug reactions, skin cancer, infections, weakening of the immune system, and damage to the eyes, including cataracts, photokeratitis (snow blindness) and eye cancer. Injuries caused by tanning devices lead to over 3,000 emergency-room cases a year in the United States alone.[d] Physicians may use or recommend tanning devices to treat skin conditions such as psoriasis, but the World Health Organization does not recommend their use for cosmetic purposes. The WHO's International Agency for Research on Cancer includes tanning devices, along with ultraviolet radiation from the sun, in its list of group 1 carcinogens.
- 1 Background
- 2 Devices
- 3 Lotions, goggles
- 4 Prevalence
- 5 Reasons
- 6 Risks
- 7 Regulation
- 8 See also
- 9 Notes
- 10 References
- 11 Bibliography
Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is part of the electromagnetic spectrum, just beyond visible light. Ultraviolet wavelengths are 100 to 400 nanometres (nm, billionths of a metre) and are divided into three bands: A, B and C. UVA wavelengths are the longest, 315 to 400 nm; UVB are 280 to 315 nm, and UVC wavelengths are the shortest, 100 to 280 nm.[e]
About 95% of the UVR that reaches the earth from the sun is UVA and 5% UVB; no appreciable UVC reaches the earth. While tanning systems before the 1970s produced some UVC, modern tanning devices produce no UVC, a small amount of UVB and mostly UVA. Classified by the WHO as a group 1 carcinogen, UVR has "complex and mixed effects on human health". It triggers the synthesis of vitamin D and endorphins in the skin, but it also causes skin cancer and other damage, including wrinkles.
In 1890 the Danish physician Niels Ryberg Finsen developed a carbon arc lamp ("Finsen's light" or a "Finsen lamp") that produced ultraviolet radiation for use in skin therapy, including to treat lupus vulgaris. He won the 1903 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for his work.
Until the late 19th century in Europe and the United States, pale skin was a symbol of high social class among white people. Victorian women would carry parasols and wear wide-brimmed hats and gloves; their homes featured heavy curtains that kept out the sun. But as the working classes moved from country work to city factories, and to crowded, dark, unsanitary homes, pale skin became increasingly associated with poverty and ill health. In 1923 Coco Chanel returned from a holiday in Cannes with a tan, later telling Vogue magazine: "A golden tan is the index of chic!" Tanned skin had become a fashion accessory.
In parallel physicians began advising their patients on the benefits of the "sun cure", citing its antiseptic properties. Sunshine was promoted as a treatment for depression, diabetes, constipation, pneumonia, high and low blood pressure, and many other ailments. Home-tanning equipment was introduced in the 1920s in the form of "sunlamps" or "health lamps", UV lamps that emitted a large percentage of UVB, leading to burns. Friedrich Wolff, a German scientist, began using UV light on athletes, and developed beds that emitted 95% UVA and 5% UVB, which reduced the likelihood of burning. In 1978 Wolff's devices began selling in the United States, and the indoor tanning industry was born. The first tanning salons opened in Europe and North America in the late 1970s.
Tanning lamps, also known as tanning bulbs or tanning tubes, produce the ultraviolet light in tanning devices. The performance (or output) varies widely between brands and styles. Most are low-pressure fluorescent tubes, but high-pressure bulbs also exist. The electronics systems and number of lamps affect performance, but to a lesser degree than the lamp itself. Tanning lamps are regulated separately from tanning beds in most countries, as they are the consumable portion of the system.
|Look up tanning bed in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.|
Most tanning beds are horizontal enclosures with a bench and canopy (lid) that house long, low-pressure fluorescent bulbs (100–200 watt) under an acrylic surface. The tanner is surrounded by bulbs when the canopy is closed. Modern tanning beds emit mostly UVA (the sun emits around 95% UVA and 5% UVB). One review of studies found that the UVB irradiance of beds was on average lower than the summer sun at latitudes 37°S to 35°N, but that UVA irradiance was on average much higher.
The user sets a timer (or it is set remotely by the salon operator), lies on the bed and pulls down the canopy. The maximum exposure time for most low-pressure beds is 15–20 minutes. Maximum times are set by the manufacturer according to how long it takes to produce four "minimal erythema doses" (MEDs), an upper limit laid down by the FDA. An MED is the amount of UV radiation that will produce erythema (redness of the skin) within a few hours of exposure.
High-pressure beds use smaller, higher-wattage quartz bulbs and emit a higher percentage of UVA. They may emit 10–15 times more UVA than the midday sun, and have a shorter maximum exposure time (typically 10–12 minutes). UVA gives an immediate, short-term tan by bronzing melanin in the skin, but no new melanin is formed. UVB has no immediate bronzing effect, but with a delay of 72 hours makes the skin produce new melanin, leading to tans of longer duration. UVA is less likely to cause burning or dry skin than UVB, but is associated with wrinkling and loss of elasticity because it penetrates deeper.
Commercial tanning beds cost $6,000 to $30,000 as of 2006, with high-pressure beds at the high end. One Manhattan chain was charging $10 to $35 per session in 2016, depending on the number, strength, and type of bulbs. This is known as level 1–6 tanning; level 1 involves a basic low-pressure bed with 36 x 100-watt bulbs. Depending on the quality of the bed, it may contain a separate facial tanner, shoulder tanners, a choice of tanning levels and UVA/UVB combinations, sound system, MP3 connection, aromatherapy, air conditioning, a misting option and voice guide. There are also open-air beds, in which the tanner is not entirely enclosed.
Tanning booths (also known as stand-up sunbeds) are vertical enclosures; the tanner stands during exposure, hanging onto straps or handrails, and is surrounded by tanning bulbs. In most models, the tanner closes a door, but there are open designs too. Some booths use the same electronics and lamps as tanning beds, but most have more lamps and are likely to use 160–200 watt lamps. They often have a maximum session of 7–15 minutes. There are other technical differences, or degrees of intensity, but for all practical intents, their function and safety are the same as a horizontal bed. Booths have a smaller footprint, which some commercial operators find useful. Some tanners prefer booths out of concern for hygiene, since the only shared surface is the floor.
Before entering a tanning unit, the tanner usually applies indoor tanning lotion to the whole body and may use a separate facial-tanning lotion. These lotions are considerably more expensive than drugstore lotions. They contain no sunscreen, but instead moisturize the skin with ingredients such as aloe vera, hempseed oil and sunflower seed oil. They may also contain dihydroxyacetone, a sunless tanner. So-called "tingle" tanning lotions cause vasodilation, increasing blood circulation.
Goggles (eye protection) should be worn to avoid eye damage. In one 2004 study, tanners said they avoided goggles to prevent leaving pale skin around the eyes. In the US, CFR Title 21 requires that new tanning equipment come with eye protection and most states require that commercial tanning operators provide eye protection for their clients. Laws in other countries are similar.
Almost all studies have found a higher prevalence among women and girls than men and boys. An indoor tanner is likely to be a white female, 16–25 years old, with low-to-moderate skin sensitivity, who knows other tanners. Studies seeking to link indoor tanning to education level and income have returned inconsistent results. Prevalence was highest in one German study among those with a moderate level of education (neither high nor low).
The late teens to early–mid 20s is the highest-prevalence age group. In a national survey of white teenagers in 2003 in the US (aged 13–19), 24% had used a tanning facility. Indoor-tanning prevalence figures in the US vary from 30 million each year to just under 10 million (7.8 million women and 1.9 million men).[c]
The figures in the US are in decline: according to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention, usage in the 18–29 age group fell from 11.3 percent in 2010 to 8.6 percent in 2013, perhaps attributable in part to a 10% "tanning tax" introduced in 2010. Attitudes toward tanning vary across states; in one study, doctors in the northeast and midwest of the country were more likely than those in the south or west to recommend tanning beds to treat vitamin D deficiency and depression.
Tanning bed use is more prevalent in northern countries. In Sweden in 2001, 44% said they had used one (in a survey of 1,752 men and women aged 18–37). Their use increased in Denmark between 1994 and 2002 from 35% to 50% (reported use in the previous two years). In Germany, between 29% and 47% had used one, and one survey found that 21% had done so in the previous year. In France, 15% of adults in 1994–1995 had tanned indoors; the practice was more common in the north of France. In 2006, 12% of grade 9–10 students in Canada had used a tanning bed in the last year. In 2004, 7% of 8–11-year-olds in Scotland said they had used one. Tanning bed use is higher in the UK in the north of England. One study found that the prevalence was lower in London than in less urban areas of the country.
Density of facilities
Tanning facilities are ubiquitous in the US, although the figures are in decline. In a study in the US published in 2002, there was a higher density in colder areas with a lower median income and higher proportion of whites. A study in 1997 found an average of 50.3 indoor-tanning facilities in 20 US cities (13.89 facilities for every 100,000 residents); the highest was 134 in Minneapolis, MN, and the lowest four in Honolulu, Hawaii. In 2006 a study of 116 cities in the US found 41.8 facilities on average, a higher density than either Starbucks or McDonald's. Of the country's 125 top colleges and universities in 2014, 12% had indoor-tanning facilities on campus and 42.4% in off-campus housing, 96% of the latter free of charge to the tenants.
There are fewer professional salons than tanning facilities; the latter includes tanning beds in gyms, spas and similar. According to the FDA, citing the Indoor Tanning Association, there were 25,000 tanning salons in 2010 in the US (population 308.7 million in 2010).[f] Mailing-list data suggest there were 18,200 in September 2008 and 12,200 in September 2015, a decline of 30 percent. According to Chris Sternberg of the American Suntanning Association, the figures are 18,000 in 2009 and 9,500 in 2016.
The South West Public Health Observatory found 5,350 tanning salons in the UK in 2009: 4,492 in England (population 52.6 million in 2010), 484 in Scotland (5.3 million), 203 in Wales (3 million) and 171 in Northern Ireland (1.8 million).
Reasons cited for indoor tanning include improving appearance, acquiring a pre-holiday tan, feeling good and treating a skin condition. Tanners often cite feelings of well-being; exposure to tanning beds is reported to "increase serum beta-endorphin levels by 44%". Beta-endorphin is associated with feelings of relaxation and euphoria, including "runner's high".
Improving appearance is the most-cited reason. Studies show that tanned skin has semiotic power, signifying health, beauty, youth and the ability to seduce. Women, in particular, say not only that they prefer their appearance with tanned skin, but that they receive the same message from friends and family, especially from other women. They believe tanned skin makes them look thinner and more toned, and that it covers or heals skin blemishes such as acne. Other reasons include acquiring a base tan for further sunbathing; that a uniform tan is easier to achieve in a tanning unit than in the sun, and a desire to avoid tan lines. Proponents of indoor tanning say that tanning beds deliver more consistent, predictable exposure than the sun, but studies show that indoor tanners do suffer burns. In two surveys in the US in 1998 and 2004, 58% of indoor tanners said they had been burned during sessions.
Vitamin D is produced when the skin is exposed to UVB, whether from sunlight or a tanning bed.[g] It is needed for mineralization of bone and bone growth. Areas in which vitamin D's role is being investigated include reducing the risk of cancer, heart disease, multiple sclerosis and glucose dysregulation. Exposing arms and legs to a minimal 0.5 erythemal (mild sunburn) UVB dose is equal to consuming about 3000 IU of vitamin D3. In a study in Boston, MA, researchers found that adults who used tanning beds had "robust" levels of 25(OH)D (46 ng/mL on average), along with higher hip bone density, compared to adults who did not use them.
Obtaining vitamin D from indoor tanning has to be weighed against the risk of developing skin cancer. The indoor-tanning industry has stressed the relationship between tanning and the production of vitamin D. According to the US National Institutes of Health, some researchers have suggested that "5–30 minutes of sun exposure between 10 AM and 3 PM at least twice a week to the face, arms, legs, or back without sunscreen usually lead to sufficient vitamin D synthesis and that the moderate use of commercial tanning beds that emit 2%–6% UVB radiation is also effective". Most researchers say the health risks outweigh the benefits, that the UVB doses produced by tanning beds exceed what is needed for adequate vitamin D production, and that adequate vitamin D levels can be achieved by taking supplements and eating fortified foods.
Certain skin conditions, including keratosis, psoriasis, eczema and acne, may be treated with UVB light therapy, including by using tanning beds in commercial salons. Using tanning beds allows patients to access UV exposure when dermatologist-provided phototherapy is not available. A systematic review of studies, published in Dermatology and Therapy in 2015, noted that moderate sunlight is a treatment recommended by the American National Psoriasis Foundation, and suggested that clinicians consider UV phototherapy and tanning beds as a source of that therapy.
When UV light therapy is used in combination with psoralen, an oral or topical medication, the combined therapy is referred to as PUVA. A concern with the use of commercial tanning is that beds that primarily emit UVA may not treat psoriasis effectively. One study found that plaque psoriasis is responsive to erythemogenic doses of either UVA or UVB. It does require more energy to reach erythemogenic dosing with UVA.
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation, whether from the sun or tanning devices, is associated with weakening of the immune system, and is a major risk factor for the three main types of skin cancer: non-melanoma skin cancer (basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) and melanoma.
Non-melanoma skin cancer is significantly more common than melanoma and typically not life-threatening; there is a 95 percent cure rate with early detection and treatment. Prevalence increases with age, cumulative exposure to UV, and proximity to the equator. It is most prevalent in Australia, where the rate is 1,000 in 100,000 and where, as of 2000, it represented 75 percent of all cancers.
Melanoma is thought to account for one percent of skin cancer and accounts for most of its deaths. The average age of diagnosis is 63, but it is the most common cancer in the 25–29 age group and the second most common in the 15-29 group. In the United States, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the melanoma incidence rate was 19.7 per 100,000 in 2011, and the death rate was 2.7 per 100,000. Around 9,000 people die of melanoma every year in the United States.[h] According to one 2012 review, of the 63,942 cases of melanoma diagnosed each year across 15 European Union countries, 3,438 cases (5.4 percent) and 794 deaths (498 women and 296 men) could be attributed to indoor tanning.[i]
A 2007 analysis of epidemiological studies found a modest increase in the risk of melanoma (a relative risk of 1.15) among those who had ever used a tanning device compared to those who had not, but a 75 percent increase (a relative risk of 1.75) among those who had used one before age 30. Following that study, the IARC placed UV-emitting tanning devices on its highest cancer-risk category, "carcinogenic to humans". The agency, part of the WHO, had previously classified them as "probably carcinogenic".[j] A 2014 systematic review and meta-analysis, examining 37 studies involving 251,808 participants, found that indoor tanners had a 16 percent increased risk of developing melanoma, which increased to 23 percent for North Americans. For those who started tanning indoors before age 25, their risk further increased to 35 percent compared to those who began after age 25.
Exposure to UV radiation is associated with skin aging, wrinkle production, liver spots, loss of skin elasticity, erythema (reddening of the skin), sunburn, photokeratitis (snow blindness), ocular melanoma (eye cancer), and infections. Tanning beds can contain many microbes, some of which are pathogens that can cause skin infections and gastric distress. In one study in New York in 2009, the most common pathogens found on tanning beds were Pseudomonas spp. (aeruginosa and putida), Bacillus spp., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterococcus species, Staphylococcus aureus, and Enterobacter cloacae. Several prescription and over-the-counter drugs, including anti-depressants, antibiotics, antifungals and anti-diabetic medication, can cause photosensitivity, which makes burning the skin while tanning more likely. This risk is increased by a lack of staff training in tanning facilities.
Children and adolescents who use tanning beds are at greater risk because of biological vulnerability to UV radiation. Epidemiological studies have shown that exposure to artificial tanning increases the risk of malignant melanoma and that the longer the exposure, the greater the risk, particularly in individuals exposed before the age of 30 or who have been sunburned.
One study conducted among college students found that awareness of the risks of tanning beds did not deter the students from using them. Teenagers are frequent targets of tanning industry marketing, which includes offers of coupons and placing ads in high-school newspapers. Members of the United States House Committee on Energy and Commerce commissioned a "sting" operation in 2012, in which callers posing as a 16-year-old woman who wanted to tan for the first time called 300 tanning salons in the US. Staff reportedly failed to follow FDA recommendations, denied the risks of tanning, and offered misleading information about benefits.
Addiction to indoor tanning has been recognized as a psychiatric disorder. The disorder is characterized as excessive indoor tanning that causes the subject personal distress; it has been associated with anxiety, eating disorders and smoking. The media has described the addiction as tanorexia. According to the Canadian Pediatric Society, "repeated UVR exposures, and the use of indoor tanning beds specifically, may have important systemic and behavioural consequences, including mood changes, compulsive disorders, pain and physical dependency."
Brazil's National Health Surveillance Agency banned the use of tanning beds for cosmetic purposes in 2009, making that country the first to enact a ban. It followed a 2002 ban on minors using the beds.
Indoor tanning is prohibited for under-18s in British Columbia, Alberta, Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Ontario, Quebec, and Prince Edward Island; and for under-19s in New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland and Labrador, and the Northwest Territories. Health Canada recommends against the use of tanning equipment.
In 1997 France became the first country to ban minors from indoor tanning. Under-18s are similarly prohibited in Austria, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Portugal, Spain and the United Kingdom. In addition, Ireland prohibits salons from offering "happy hour" discounts.
In New Zealand, indoor tanning is regulated by a voluntary code of practice. Salons are asked to turn away under-18s, those with type 1 skin (fair skin that burns easily or never tans), people who experienced episodes of sunburn as children, and anyone taking certain medications, with several moles, or who has had skin cancer. Tanners are asked to sign a consent form, which includes health information and advice about the importance of wearing goggles. Surveys have found a high level of non-compliance. The government has carried out bi-annual surveys of tanning facilities since 2012.
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) classifies tanning beds as "moderate risk" devices (changed in 2014 from "low risk"). It requires that devices carry a black box warning that they should not be used on the under-18s, but it has not banned their use by minors. Thirteen states and one territory have banned under-18s from using them, and at least 42 states and the District of Columbia have imposed regulations, such as requiring parental consent. In 2010 under the Affordable Care Act, a 10% "tanning tax" was introduced, which is added to the fees charged by tanning facilities; it was expected to raise $2.7 billion for health care over ten years.
Tanning beds are regulated in the United States by the federal government's Code of Federal Regulations (21 CFR 1040.20). This is designed to ensure that the devices adhere to a set of safety rules, with the primary focus on sunbed and lamp manufacturers regarding maximum exposure times and product equivalence. In addition, states can extend regulations for salons, regarding operator training, sanitization of sunbeds and eyewear, and additional warning signs.
American osteopathic physician Joseph Mercola was prosecuted in 2016 by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) for selling tanning beds to "reverse your wrinkles" and "slash your risk of cancer". The settlement meant that consumers who had purchased the devices were eligible for refunds totalling $5.3 million. Mercola had falsely claimed that the FDA "endorsed indoor tanning devices as safe", and had failed to disclose that he had paid the Vitamin D Council for its endorsement of his devices. The FTC said that it was deceptive for the defendants to fail to disclose that tanning is not necessary to produce vitamin D.
- Lessin et al. (2012): "UVA is predominantly responsible for tanning of the skin and UVB is responsible for burning. Tanning is a human defense mechanism directed against DNA damage induced by UVR exposures. Melanin-containing melanocytes are closely associated with keratinocytes within the epidermis, and baseline pigmentation is tightly controlled by complex cellular and intercelluar pathways. Evolutionary and adaptive changes have created diversity of human pigmentation, skin types, and tanning capacities. Tanning results when UVR-induced melanogenesis increases pigment levels in the skin above baseline, and repeated exposures maintain these elevated levels. Tanning is a secondary response to UVR-induced DNA damage and molecularly linked to DNA repair pathways. Tanning beds produce UVR similar to the sun, amd likewise cause DNA damage and contribute to the development of skin cancers among humans."
- The figures were compiled from 16 countries: Australia, Canada, the United States, and 13 countries in the north and west of Europe.
- According to JAMA Dermatology in 2015, just under 10 million adults in the United States (7.8 million women and 1.9 million men) had tanned indoors in the previous 12 months, based on replies to the 2010 and 2013 National Health Interview Survey. According to the Food and Drug Administration in 2010, possibly using the Indoor Tanning Association as its source: "Each year 30 million people—over 10 percent of the American public—visit an indoor tanning facility."
- FDA (2015): "This number is based on the average yearly estimate of injuries for 2003 and 2012 (the most recent years for which data are available). It is likely that the actual number of injuries may be higher because this estimate only includes cases that are initially treated in US hospital emergency departments and reported to a central database. This estimate does not include cases that are treated in outpatient clinics, physicians' offices, not medically treated, or not reported."
- Some texts use the crossover point of UVB at 320 nm rather than 315 nm.
- FDA (2010): "The industry grew rapidly in the 1980s and 90s; today, according to the Indoor Tanning Association there are over 25,000 professional indoor tanning businesses in thousands of towns across America. Each year 30 million people—over 10 percent of the American public—visit an indoor tanning facility. The industry employs more than 160,000 Americans, mostly in small businesses. Its total economic impact exceeds $5 billion annually."
- Vitamin D can also be obtained from supplements, fortified foods, cod liver oil, and in small amounts from salmon, tuna, mackerel, swordfish, egg yolk, beef liver, cheese, and some types of mushroom.
- White people are most at risk of melanoma, with a lifetime risk of 2.5% (1 in 40), against 0.1% (1 in 1,000) for black people and 0.5% (1 in 200) for Hispanics, according to the American Cancer Society.
- This assumes an incidence-to-mortality ratio of 4.7 for women and 3.7 for men.
- IARC (2009): "The use of UV-emitting tanning devices is widespread in many developed countries, especially among young women. A comprehensive meta-analysis concluded that the risk of cutaneous melanoma is increased by 75% when use of tanning devices starts before 30 years of age. Additionally, several case–control studies provide consistent evidence of a positive association between the use of UV-emitting tanning devices and ocular melanoma. Therefore, the Working Group raised the classification of the use of UV-emitting tanning devices to Group 1, 'carcinogenic to humans'."
- Lessin, Stuart R; Perlis, Clifford S.; Zook, and Matthew B. Zook (2012). "How Ultraviolet Radiation Tans Skin" in Carolyn J. Heckman, Sharon L. Manne (eds.), Shedding Light on Indoor Tanning. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 93.
- Tanning lamps and beds, Medical Devices Advisory Committee, Food and Drug Administration, 2010, 1.
- IARC Working Group (2007). "The association of use of sunbeds with cutaneous malignant melanoma and other skin cancers: A systematic review". International Journal of Cancer. 120: 1116–1122. doi:10.1002/ijc.22453. PMID 17131335.
- Hunt et al. (2012), 7–8.
- Hay and Lipsky (2012), 181–184.
- Mackenzie; Wehner, R.; Chren, Mary-Margaret; Nameth, Danielle (2014). "International Prevalence of Indoor Tanning: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis". JAMA Dermatology. 150 (4): 390–400. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.6896. PMC . PMID 24477278.
- Guy, Gery P.; et al. "Recent Changes in the Prevalence of and Factors Associated With Frequency of Indoor Tanning Among US Adults". JAMA Dermatology. 151: 1256–1259. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.1568. PMC . PMID 26131768.
- "The Public Health etc (Scotland) Act 2008 (Sunbed) Regulations 2009: Regulatory Impact Assessment (RIA)", CMO and Public Health Directorate, Scottish Government, 2009.
- Pawlak, Mary T.; Bui, Melanie; Amir, Mahsa; et al. (2012). ""Legislation Restricting Access to Indoor Tanning Throughout the World"". JAMA Dermatology. 148 (9): 1006–1012. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2012.2080. PMID 22801924.
- Nick Mulcahy (20 January 2015). "Australia Bans Tanning Salons", Medscape.
- Danielle Taddeo; Richard Stanwick (2012). "Banning children and youth under the age of 18 years from commercial tanning facilities". Canadian Pediatric Society.
- "The Risks of Tanning". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 14 October 2015.
- Fatiha El Ghissassi, Robert Baan, Kurt Straif, et al (WHO International Agency for Research on Cancer Monograph Working Group) (August 2009). "A Review of Human Carcinogens—Part D: Radiation". The Lancet Oncology. 10 (8): 751–752. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70213-X. PMID 19655431.
- "Sunlamps and Sunlamp Products (Tanning Beds/Booths)". U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 22 December 2015.
- Radack, Kyle P.; Farhangian, Michael E.; Anderson, Kathryn L.; Feldman, Steven R. (2015). "A review of the use of tanning beds as a dermatological treatment". Dermatology and Therapy. 5 (1): 37–51. doi:10.1007/s13555-015-0071-8. PMC . PMID 25735439.
- "Artificial tanning sunbeds: risk and guidance". World Health Organization. 2003.
- Nikiforos Kollias; Eduardo Ruvolo Jr; Robert M. Sayre (November–December 2011). "The Value of the Ratio of UVA to UVB in Sunlight". Photochemistry and Photobiology. 87 (6): 1474–1475. doi:10.1111/j.1751-1097.2011.00980.x. PMID 21770951.
- D'Orazio, John; et al. (June 2013). "UV Radiation and the Skin". Internal Journal of Molecular Science. 14 (6): 12222–12248. doi:10.3390/ijms140612222. PMC . PMID 23749111.
- "Scientific Review of Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation, Broad Spectrum and UVA, UVB, and UVC". National Toxicology Program, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services. 5 November 2014.
- Celeste Robb-Nicholson (September 2009). "By the way, doctor: Is a tanning bed safer than sunlight?". Harvard Medical School.
- Grzybowski, Andrzej; Pietrzak, Krzysztof (July 2012). "From patient to discoverer—Niels Ryberg Finsen (1860-1904)—the founder of phototherapy in dermatology" (PDF). Clinics in Dermatology. 30 (4): 451–455. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.11.019. PMID 22855977.
- Holick, Michael (2016). "Biological Effects of Sunlight, Ultraviolet Radiation, Visible Light, Infrared Radiation and Vitamin D for Health". Anticancer Research. 36 (3): 1345–1356. PMID 26977036.
- "The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1903". Nobelprize.org (Nobel Media AB). Archived from the original on 22 October 2016.
- Hunt et al. (2012), 9–10.
- Vannini, Phillip; McCright, Aaron M. (2004). "To Die For: The Semiotic Seductive Power of the Tanned Body". Symbolic Interaction. 27 (3): 309–332 . doi:10.1525/si.2004.27.3.309.
- Sophie Wilkinson (19 February 2012). "A short history of tanning", The Guardian.
- Denise Winterman (1 November 2006). "A tan to die for", BBC News Magazine.
- Hunt et al. (2012), 13–14.
- Hunt et al. (2012), 14–15.
- Coups and Phillips (2012), 33, 35.
- "About Wolf". Wolff System Technology Corporation. Retrieved 4 November 2016.
- Cite error: The named reference
Balk2013was invoked but never defined (see the help page).
- "Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation and Cancer Risk", American Cancer Society, 2015.
- Lille; Nilsen, Tove N.; Hannevik, M.; Veierød, M. B. (2016). "Ultraviolet exposure from indoor tanning devices: a systematic review". British Journal of Dermatology. 174 (4): 730–740. doi:10.1111/bjd.14388. PMID 26749382.
- Sharon A. Miller, et al. (2002). "Production and persistence of UV-induced Tan", in Michael F. Holick (ed.). Biologic Effects of Light 2001 (Proceedings of a Symposium, Boston, Massachusetts, 16–18 June 2001). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers (113–126), 114. ISBN 978-07923-7669-9
- Heckman, Carolyn J.; et al. (2013). "Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing". Journal of Visualized Experiments. 75: 50175. doi:10.3791/50175. PMC . PMID 23748556.
- Lessin et al. (2012), 92.
- "No national chain under the sun", Associated Press, 17 March 2006.
- "Tanning", NY Sun Club. Retrieved 7 November 2016.
- For examples of features, see "Open Sun 1050", Ergoline, JK Group, retrieved 7 November 2016, and "KBL 6840 Alpha", courtesy of Malibu Tan, Coldwater, MI, 14 February 2013.
- "Sunbed eye damage warning issued", BBC News, 17 August 2010.
- Vannini and McCright 2004, 325.
- Coups and Phillips (2012), 58.
- Coups and Phillips (2012), 64.
- American (2011). "Policy Statement—Ultraviolet Radiation: A Hazard to Children and Adolescents". Pediatrics. 127: 588–597. doi:10.1542/peds.2010-3501. PMID 21357336.
- Coups and Phillips (2012), 59.
- Hay and Lipsky (2012), 181–182.
- Hay and Lipsky (2012), 184.
- Esther Addley (1 August 2009). "How Britain fell in love with the tan", The Guardian.
- Palmer, Richard; et al. (2002). "Indoor Tanning Facility Density in Eighty U.S. Cities". Journal of Community Health. 27: 191–202. doi:10.1023/A:1015202023512. PMID 12027269.
- Coups and Phillips (2012), 36.
- Pagoto, Sherry L. (2015). "Availability of Tanning Beds on US College Campuses". JAMA Dermatology. 151 (1): 59–63. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3590. PMID 25353714.
- For population: "Population Distribution and Change: 2000 to 2010", United States Census Bureau, March 2011.
- Patrick Clark (5 October 2016). "Twilight of the Tanning Salons", Bloomberg.
- For population: "Revised Annual Mid-year Population Estimates: 2001 to 2010", Office for National Statistics, 17 December 2013.
- "To Die For: The Semiotic Seductive Power of the Tanned Body". Symbolic Interaction. 27: 328. doi:10.1525/si.2004.27.3.309.
- "To Die For: The Semiotic Seductive Power of the Tanned Body". Symbolic Interaction. 27: 319–324. doi:10.1525/si.2004.27.3.309.
- Alan C. Geller (2002). "Use of Sunscreen, Sunburning Rates, and Tanning Bed Use Among More Than 10,000 US Children and Adolescents". Pediatrics. 109 (6): 1009–1014. doi:10.1542/peds.109.6.1009. PMID 12042536.
- Cokkinides, Vilma; Weinstock, Martin; Lazovich, DeAnn; Ward, Elizabeth; Thun, Michael (1 January 2009). "Indoor tanning use among adolescents in the US, 1998 to 2004". Cancer. 115 (1): 190–198. doi:10.1002/cncr.24010. PMID 19085965.
- Also see Boldeman C, Branstrom R, Dal H, Kristjansson S, Rodvall Y, Jansson B, et al. (2001). "Tanning habits and sunburn in a Swedish population age 13-50 years". European Journal of Cancer. 37 (18): 2441–2448. doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00310-0. PMID 11720841.
- "Vitamin D", Office of Dietary Supplements, National Institutes of Health, 11 February 2016.
- Arash Hossein-nezhad; Michael F. Holick (July 2013). "Vitamin D for Health: A Global Perspective". Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 88 (7): 720–755. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.011. PMC . PMID 23790560.
- Holick, Michael F. (2007). "Vitamin D Deficiency". New England Journal of Medicine. 357: 266–281. doi:10.1056/NEJMra070553. PMID 17634462.
- Woo, Denise K.; Eide, Melody J. (2010). "Tanning beds, skin cancer, and vitamin D: An examination of the scientific evidence and public health implications". Dermatologic Therapy. 23 (1): 61–71. doi:10.1111/j.1529-8019.2009.01291.x. PMID 20136909.
- Schulman, Joshua M.; Fisher, David E. (2009). "Indoor UV tanning and skin cancer: health risks and opportunities". Current Opinion in Oncology. 21 (2): 144–149. doi:10.1097/CCO.0b013e3283252fc5. PMC . PMID 19532016.
- Patrizi, Annalisa; Raone, Beatrice; Maria Ravaioli, Giulia (2015). "Management of atopic dermatitis: safety and efficacy of phototherapy". Clinical, Cosmetic and Investigational Dermatology. 8: 511–520. doi:10.2147/CCID.S87987. PMC . PMID 26491366.
- Farahnik, Benjamin; et al. "(September 2016). [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4972736/ "The Patient's Guide to Psoriasis Treatment. Part 2: PUVA Phototherapy"].". Dermatology and Therapy. 6 (3): 315–324. doi:10.1007/s13555-016-0130-9. PMC . PMID 27474030. External link in
- "Exposure to Artificial UV Radiation and Skin Cancer", IARC Working Group Reports Volume 1, World Health Organization 2006.
- Wehner, Mackenzie, R.; Shive, Melissa L.; Chren, Mary-Margaret; Han, Jiali; Qureshi, Abrar A.; Linos, Eleni (2 October 2012). "Indoor tanning and non-melanoma skin cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 345: e5909. doi:10.1136/bmj.e5909. PMC . PMID 23033409.
- Lluria-Prevatt et al. (2013), 321.
- "Cancer Facts and Figures 2016", American Cancer Society, 2016, 20.
- Colantonio, Sophia; Bracken, Michael B.; Beecker, Jennifer (May 2014). "The association of indoor tanning and melanoma in adults: Systematic review and meta-analysis". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 70 (5): 847–857. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.11.050. PMID 24629998.
- "Key statistics for melanoma skin cancer", American Cancer Society, 20 May 2016.
- Gandini, Sara; Autier, Philippe; Boniol, Mathieu (2011). "Reviews on sun exposure and artificial light and melanoma". Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology. 107 (3): 36–366. doi:10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2011.09.011. PMID 21958910.
- "Vital Signs: Melanoma Incidence and Mortality Trends and Projections — United States, 1982–2030", Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 5 June 2015.
- Boniol, Mathieu; et al. (2012). "Cutaneous melanoma attributable to sunbed use: systematic review and meta-analysis". BMJ. 345: e4757. doi:10.1136/bmj.e4757. PMC . PMID 22833605.
- Lluria-Prevatt et al. (2013), 324.
- Catherine M. Olsen; Adèle C. Green (October 2012) "More evidence of harms of sunbed use, particularly for young people", BMJ 345:7 doi:10.1136/bmj.e6101 JSTOR 41723950
- Colantonio, S; Bracken, MB; Beecker, J (May 2014). "The association of indoor tanning and melanoma in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis.". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 70 (5): 847–57.e1–18. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2013.11.050. PMID 24629998.
- Julie E. Russak; Darrell S. Rigel (January 2010). "Tanning bed hygiene: Microbes found on tanning beds present a potential health risk". Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology. 62 (1): 155–157. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2009.05.034. PMID 20082899.
- Craig Sinclair (2003). "Artificial tanning sunbeds: risk and guidance", World Health Organization, 6.
- Balk, Sophie J.; Geller, Alan C. (2008). "Teenagers and Artificial Tanning". Pediatrics. 121 (5): 1040–1042. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2256. PMID 18450907.
- J. Matthew Knight, Anna N. Kirincich, Evan R. Farmer et al. (October 2002). "Awareness of the risks of tanning lamps does not influence behavior among college students". JAMA Dermatology. 138 (10): 1311–1315. doi:10.1001/archderm.138.10.1311. PMID 12374536.
- Charlie Pokora (Spring 2010). "Indoor Tanning: Risk to Health vs. Risk to Freedom". The Triple Helix, 21.
- Petit, Aymeric; et al. (2014). "(June 2014). "Phenomenology and psychopathology of excessive indoor tanning"". International Journal of Dermatology. 53 (6): 664–672. doi:10.1111/ijd.12336. PMID 24601904.
- Carol E. Lee (13 May 2005). "It's Only May, and the Tanorexics Are Already Complaining", The New York Times.
- Megan Palin and Ken McGrego (13 January 2016). "Black market for suntans emerges following government bans on commercial use of solariums", news.com.au.
- "Resolução n°59 de 9 de novembro 2009", Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, 11 November 2009.
- "B.C. Tanning Bed Ban". British Columbia. Government of British Columbia. 2012. Archived from the original on 2016-10-31. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "Alberta bans the tan". Cancer.ca. Canadian Cancer Society. 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-10-31. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "The Public Health Act and Tanning Regulation". Manitoba. Government of Manitoba. 2015. Archived from the original on 2016-10-18. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "The Tanning Bed Regulations to Take Effect This Fall". Saskatchewan. Government of Ontario. 2015-09-24. Archived from the original on 2016-09-28. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "The Skin Cancer Prevention Act (Tanning Beds), 2013". Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care. Government of Ontario. 2014. Archived from the original on 2016-10-28. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "Tanning beds forbidden for Quebec minors". CBC. 2013-02-10. Archived from the original on 2014-03-21. Retrieved 2016-10-31..
- "Au combat depuis 1938 - Société canadienne du cancer". Cancer.ca (in French). Canadian Cancer Society. Retrieved 2013-10-15.
- "Tanning beds now off limits for P.E.I. minors". CBC. 2013-09-01. Archived from the original on 2016-10-31. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "Tanning Beds and Youth". New Brunswick Canada. Government of New Brunswick. 2013. Archived from the original on 2016-10-31. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "Tanning Beds". Nova Scotia. Government of Nova Scotia. 2013.
- "New Legislation Protects Children, Families and Communities". Newfoundland Labrador. Government of Newfoundland and Labrador. 2014-01-26. Archived from the original on 2015-05-14. Retrieved 2016-10-31.
- "Personal Service Establishment Regulations" (PDF). Justice. Government of Northwest Territories. 2012. pp. 10–11.
- "Tanning beds and lamps". Government of Canada. 12 January 2012.
- David Kearns (3 March 2015). "Irish Cancer Society seeks sun-bed tanning ban for fair-skinned people", Irish Independent.
- Belinda Castles (4 February 2016). "Sunbeds", Consumer New Zealand.
- Cancer Control New Zealand (13 December 2010). "New Zealand sunbed operators under the lamp!". Infonews.
- "Sunbeds and tanning booths", New Zealand Ministry of Health, 30 September 2016.
- "FDA to require warnings on sunlamp products", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 29 May 2014; "CFR – Code of Federal Regulations Title 21", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1 April 2016.
- "Indoor Tanning Restrictions for Minors | A State-By-State Comparison", National Conference of State Legislatures, 31 March 2016.
- Ellis, Blake (24 March 2010). "Tanning salons burned by health care bill". CNN.
- "Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 (Sec. 1040.20)", U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1 April 2016.
- Federal Trade Commission v. Mercola, 1:16-cv-04282 (N.D. Ill. 13 April 2016).
- Janssen, Kim (14 April 2016). "Accused by feds, sun bed-selling doctor settles for up to $5.3 million". Chicago Tribune.
- Fair, Lesley (14 April 2016). "Deceptive 'safe' indoor tanning claims burn consumers". United States Federal Trade Commission.
|Wikimedia Commons has media related to Tanning beds.|
- Book chapters are cited in short form above and long form below. All other sources are cited above only.
- Coups, Elliot J. and Phillips, L. Alison (2012). "Prevalence and Correlates of Indoor Tanning", in Carolyn J. Heckman, Sharon L. Manne (eds.), Shedding Light on Indoor Tanning. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media, 5–32. ISBN 978-94-007-2048-0
- Hay, Jennifer and Lipsky, Samara (2012), "International Perspectives on Indoor Tanning", in Heckman and Manne (eds)., 179–193.
- Hunt, Yvonne; Augustson, Erik; Rutten, Lila; Moser, Richard; and Yaroch, Amy (2012). "History and Culture of Tanning in the United States", in Heckman and Manne (eds.), 33–68.
- Lessin, Stuart R; Perlis, Clifford S.; Zook, and Matthew B. Zook (2012). "How Ultraviolet Radiation Tans Skin" in Heckman and Manne (eds.), 87–94.
- Lluria-Prevatt, Maria; Dickinson, Sally E.; and Alberts, David S. (2013). "Skin Cancer Prevention", in David Alberts, Lisa M. Hess (eds.). Fundamentals of Cancer Prevention. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer Verlag, 321–376. ISBN 978-3-642-38983-2