Template:Did you know nominations/2011–12 PBA Philippine Cup Finals
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Miyagawa (talk) 18:39, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
2011–12 PBA Philippine Cup Finals
[edit]- ... that by winning the 2011–12 PBA Philippine Cup Finals, the Talk 'N Text Tropang Texters became the first team in 27 years to successfully defend an All-Filipino Championship?
Created/expanded by WayKurat (talk). Self nom at 00:55, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Article is long enough and adequately cited, hook is interesting and cited, but the article has not been created nor expanded 5x within the last five days, and not on 30 January, the section you put it in. This is assuming you meant the first article (which has to be bolded in the hook), which is newer. What a pro. (talk) 08:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have expanded the article, adding summaries on each of the games and references to the DYK entry. Kindly check. Thanks. -WayKurat (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
- Article is nice and so is the hook, but DYK Check says that "assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 39 edits ago on January 21, 2012," which is too long ago to be considered a "new" article. However, while Wikipedia says I could accept it, I'm not sure if I should. I'll need someone else's opinion on this. What a pro. (talk) 07:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- The "five days in Swahili rule" applies, methinks, as there's still quite a few articles older than the 21st still in the queue. I say it's OK. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 09:50, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, then. I'll accept this. What a pro. (talk) 12:27, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- The "five days in Swahili rule" applies, methinks, as there's still quite a few articles older than the 21st still in the queue. I say it's OK. :) - The Bushranger One ping only 09:50, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- Article is nice and so is the hook, but DYK Check says that "assuming article is at 5x now, expansion began 39 edits ago on January 21, 2012," which is too long ago to be considered a "new" article. However, while Wikipedia says I could accept it, I'm not sure if I should. I'll need someone else's opinion on this. What a pro. (talk) 07:55, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have expanded the article, adding summaries on each of the games and references to the DYK entry. Kindly check. Thanks. -WayKurat (talk) 12:54, 31 January 2012 (UTC)